User talk:Rklear/Archives/ 1

Jody Wagner Article
I noticed your comments at Talk:Jody Wagner, and I was wondering if you are proposing that the article title should be changed from Jody Wagner to Jody M. Wagner. Please feel free to contact me on my Talk page regarding this matter. --TommyBoy (talk) 22:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for replying to my message so quickly. I have created the previously non-existent Jody M. Wagner page as a redirect to the Jody Wagner article, because all sources listing her middle initiail that I have seen in creating and expanding the article state that it is "M" and not "W" as you quote one source as reporting. I further confirmed this by checking which pages link to Jody M. Wagner, finding at least one which should link to the Jody Wagner article. My other reason for creating the redirect page was to avoid the possibility of another user creating a duplicate article on Jody Wagner. --TommyBoy (talk) 02:12, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

helio delete
rklear i appreciated your feedback on the helio deletion. it was well thought out. shell was referencing my suggestion but grossly mischaracterized my reasoning which was rooted in Wikepedia Policy. Wikipedia policy states: "Information on products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy. In that case, the discussion of the company's products and services should be broken out from the company article in summary style."

since this information is all already included in the main company article my contention is that it should be removed based on 1. policy dictates it should be in the main article, 2 it currently is in the main article therefore it is redundant and out of compliance.76.213.229.6 (talk) 04:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Glenn Nye
That was an old AfD, prior to the Primary election and the discussion of Notability as it pertains to politicians. (I re-added the photo, then saw your comment on your previous add and reversion.) Flatterworld (talk) 15:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't remember offhand - others have noted the change in more recent discussions on notability. We'll all have more time to revisit this after November 4th, I really just wanted to let you know the photo was re-added. Flatterworld (talk) 16:32, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Virginia House of Delegates
btw - I updated Ward Armstrong today. I'm using the congressional template in Externals links because it formats the VoteSmart link better. Also, I saw the VPAP link elsewhere so I added that as well. You may want to do the same as you work on the rest of the members. I started out working on all the congressional members (both houses, all parties) for every state, then focused on just the majority party, then focused on just the ones with 'titles'...I've steadily lowered my sights and expectations as I realized how much time it takes. ;-) If everyone worked on their own state it would be helpful, so thank you for anything and everything you do with Virginia. Good luck. :-) Flatterworld (talk) 16:38, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, Dave Albo does seem to have copied his campaign profile directly into his article - no wikifying, no references, doesn't appear he bothered to look at any other politician articles to get a feel for what belongs where and how. (lol) Maybe after the election one of us will have time to go through and straighten some of these out. I've seen similar stuff with a few other politicians, but that was earlier and I had time to fix them up. I'm amazed these guys don't understand what Wikipedia is - and then I remember "the Google" and the comment about "tubes". Then I'm ready for a Guinness. ;-) Flatterworld (talk) 17:41, 1 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Awesome work on these - glad I'm not the only one who noticed the lack. As I am currently occupied stubbing each current member of the Senate of France, though, I shall have to leave you to this yourself.  Have fun, tho'.


 * Oh...and if my plans hold, someday you may be stubbing an article on me for the House of Delegates page. :-) --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 19:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your work on creating these HoD pages. FWIW, when there's an opening paragraph of biographical information on a single chamber that's up to snuff, let me know. I run Richmond Sunlight, and I'd love to use that first paragraph to auto-populate each legislators' page, and then link to their Wikipedia entries so that people can learn more about them. --WaldoJ (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Virginia's 2nd congressional district election, 2008
Now that the election's over and Glenn Nye will keep his own article, what do you think of changing Virginia's 2nd congressional district election, 2008 to redirect to United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia, 2008? I think all the material is already in that article except for the Electoral history, but I don't know that we need that. If you want to keep it, you could copy it to Virginia's 2nd congressional district. Let me know what you think. Flatterworld (talk) 06:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I meant Virginia. :-) I copied the history yesterday - at least we have a record of it even if someone changes it later - and just did the redirect and fixed the other links to it. My work here is done. :-) Flatterworld (talk) 21:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Milhist!
 Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including WPMILHIST Announcements there.
 * Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, article logistics, and other tasks.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
 * If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts and copy-editing alerts.
 * The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 22:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Color shading
I copied the color shading used in the Elections articles. I don't think those shades create any visibility problems, but that may depend on the browser. I don't like the narrow flag area becuase it doesn't give a good graphical image. Let's look at the rest of the states - maybe there's yet another option we'd both be happy with. Flatterworld (talk) 01:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I got rid of the Democratic/Republican links (they're in the lede, which imo is sufficient) and limited the color shading to the Party column. If we're not going to do the whole row, I think that column is enough. It's wide enough to give a graphical representation. I'm happy with it - let me know what you think. Flatterworld (talk) 22:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Good. :-) I've now fixed the tables in the Virginia Senate the same way. There's one small table in the House of Delegates I didn't fix because I'm not sure how to do it with the coalition split affecting some of the formatting. If you can figure out how to fix it, please do. If I have time I'll help you with creating the rest of the stubs for the Delegates, and then maybe Virginia will be ready for the 2009 elections. :-) Flatterworld (talk) 02:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Dave Albo
Thanks for removing the supposed Wikipedia controversy bit from Dave Albo's page, as per WP:GRAPEVINE. Not only was the claim wrong ("significant attention" from "newspapers"?), but to see me cited as a source for that was particularly frustrating. It put me in an awkward spot (should I be removing references to me?), so I appreciate your cleaning it up. --WaldoJ (talk) 02:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Rollback
This item explains how to get it, which is to request it, and if they think you're sufficiently "safe", they should grant it. It is basically a keystroke-saver, and is only allowed to be used for reverting deliberate vandalism - stupid stuff like posting obscenities or other nonsense; or making mass deletions for no apparent reason. It is not to be used with anything resembling a content dispute, and that's why it was taken away from NWA. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 00:50, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Another way is the UNDO feature, which is only slightly more work. Unless that requires some special privilege also. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 01:35, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Jerold Hoffberger page
The trade which involved the Orioles acquiring Frank Robinson from the Reds was engineered by outgoing general manager Lee MacPhail and executed by his successor Harry Dalton. Jerold Hoffberger's management style was never hands-on, so he didn't have a direct role in the transaction.

The recently-added information came directly from the sources mentioned in the bibliography. The other changes were for the sole purpose of giving the page a clean look and making it more user-friendly. The Ink Daddy! (talk) 00:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Fizzy Blue Bottles
I have proposed a merge to the new article gummies. Would you consider supporting this option at the AfD?ChildofMidnight (talk) 09:15, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

My adminship
Hi! i was wondering, could you vote for me for my RfA? Kalajan (talk) 15:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Oops! Thanks!
Thanks for fixing those glitches on Perry (surname)! Auntof6 (talk) 20:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

A Second Life Problem?
I'm confused why is is being flagged. In the notice for deletion you say that "it does nothing but promote some entity"....and that...."that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion." well, this page is not promoting A Second Life. It is written completely objectively. If it were being promoted, it would state more than basic facts of the philosophy. People could find it and easily say...i don't believe any of what the tenets of this thing are....just as they could go to the wikipedia page for Judaism, and say the same thing. Promoting it would mean that it's written in a way to clearly put it in a positive light, which it certainly does not. believe me- it couldn't do this, because i dont believe in it either. it is written as objectively and encyclopedic as possible. it is also neither a company, or a product. you couldn't say 'rationalism' is a company or product. There is no company called A Second Life, just as there is nothing being sold called A Second Life. It's merely the name of a philosophy, just as stoicism is the name of a philosophy, christianity is the name of a philosophy, etc

Christian Schoyen page
isn't being a published author with books still in print and currently being published, make someone notable for a wikipedia page?

armor games
you put up:

on the new article for Armor Games

More good references have been added to the article, as well as discussion of its notability. It's been added to a handful of appropriate articles and linked to from at least one or two other appropriate articles it was already mentioned but not linked to. Is this enough to remove the box at the top of the article or should more still be done? Miles Blues (talk) 01:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * i'll keep an eye open for any flash-game, etc. related articles to link to it... that's probably the easiest of the 3 issues to take care of, just takes a little time Miles Blues (talk) 01:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Ed Genson
thx for the help on the Ed Genson article.AaronCBurke (talk) 03:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Baritenor
Just to let you know, I changed the notice from PROD to speedy delete. It's already been deleted once at AfD: Articles for deletion/Baritenor. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 22:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Dwight Clinton Jones
Hi This is Tacocraz I was recently editing Dwight Clinton Jones page, i made a problem trying to edit it, i just wanted to know if you could put the updated information about him. Dwight Jones is now the current Mayor of Richmond, Virginia as of 2009, hes no longer delegate for the 70th district. Delores L. McQuinn is now delegate for his district from the special election in December.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tacocraz (talk • contribs) 20:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry I wasn't aware of the election coming up.

I didn't know how to add to his profile that he is the mayor of richmond now, could you add the table that goes on thr right hand side of the article. ThaNKS FOR THE UPDATE

Category:Commander-in-chiefs of Bombay
Big Error. Yes, it should be moved. Kensplanet TC 16:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Arbitrary table widths
Sorry. You're right, I will revert my edit. Antonio V (talk) 08:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

New eds
Seem to get a thrill about putting new stubs up - little or no WP:RS, no categories and no project tags - project wise (Indonesia on WP en) it is a constant issue -alexbot can be an unpleasant sight at times SatuSuro 04:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I am very sorry if I have created some misunderstandings Please let me answer it all here - if you dont mind

''I have a feeling you don't understand the purpose of tags. They are not an indication that the article needs to be deleted. They are there to let current and future editors know how they can help improve the article.''

I fully understand the purpose of tags - and have - if you look on my user page a whole lot of links that show my interest in the Indonesian project and the aspect of trying to save the project from disaster - over time.

''You seem to think I am out to "get" this article. Far from it. I saved it from speedy deletion, and I think it is a worthwhile subject.''

Not at all if you have saved it from eager speedy - thanks - I never thought you had anything about the article.

''Articles about people from non-English-speaking countries get unfair treatment from deletion-happy editors, especially when they are drafted by editors whose first language is not English. Short of writing the whole article myself, the most I can do is point the way to the parts of it that need work, so that other people won't delete an important article. That is why the tags are there.''

Tell me about it - and keep up the good work -- cheers SatuSuro 05:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

John Brownlee sex scandal
At the moment, it doesn't, I admit. I'm in the process of expanding the articles on Alberta Premiers (see all of Brownlee's predecessors, as well as a few of his successors, to see the sort of thing I'm doing), and as part of that I want to hive off the sex scandal material (which could also do with a good deal of expansion) into a separate article, with a one section summary in the Brownlee article (I did a similar thing with Alexander Cameron Rutherford in creating Alberta and Great Waterways Railway scandal). I'm doing it in this order mostly for personal convenience; if it's really an issue I could expand the Brownlee article first, and then hive off the material into a newly created article; I'd be much obliged if you'd let me keep doing it this way and refrain from doing any kind of deletion-nominating for a couple of weeks. As a secondary point, it grates me a little that Brownlee's in Category:Sex scandals and Category:Political scandals in Canada; creating a new article will also allow the removal of those categories from the Brownlee article. I hope this explains things, and thanks for consulting me before charging madly over to AFD or some place. Cheers, Sarcasticidealist (talk) 06:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Ezzeldeen Abu al-Aish
Apologies if the request for deletion came across premature. I guess "awhile" is relative. I still believe that if you can show that he is notable (preferably from more than just the one event according to other editors) and advance the article it should be OK. I wasn't trying to judge your article to harshly.Cptnono (talk) 22:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * In response your message: one, I was expressing my apologies for any frustration so explanation wasn't necessary. two, other editors have already expressed that it may not be adequate.Cptnono (talk) 00:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Alpha 4615 (talk) 22:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
For your support in the Karl Brommann AFD Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:48, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

DEW ARMY FTW
Thank you for your huge expansion of Dew (disambiguation). --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 04:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Arlington
According the the United States Census Bureau (See internal link in template header) it counts as a city with a population of 100k. It must have an executive branch of government.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Do they have an executive branch of government and what do you suggest I do?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:55, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Do they have a chief executive? If not you can remove it or I will.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Terrence Warren
My mistake, I made a typo when searching for him on NFL.com. Still, red links shouldn't be included in such lists, but I'll go ahead and create it. Best, faithless   (speak)  18:35, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Le Fanu
Good deal. Thanks. --Mhking (talk) 01:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Article by Fuzzywuzzy
Thanks for adding the notification to his talk page. I'm still new at patrolling Wikipedia, and I find I forget something often when I try a new method of patrolling.--Iner22 (talk) 17:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:04, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Gjr rodriguez
Any chance you can help deal with this guy? He's creating a major mess and ignoring multiple people... JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 05:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

WP:BASEBALL...this is what Ive been trying to say all along, I'm doing this to expand the baseball knowledge. I'm not exactly sure how to "hardwire" this stubs to convey it, because every time I do, SOMEONE tries to get all stuck up hoe about it, because he thinks his wikibadge means a damn. So I'm gonna keep on doing so in the meantime despite dingleberries like you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjr rodriguez (talk • contribs) 05:40, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank you for your advice on editing potentially out-dateable statements within Wikipedia articles. Until now, I have been under the impression that such statements are frowned upon. --TommyBoy (talk) 21:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Category:Virginia political navigational boxes
I notice that this category you created is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted without discussion, in accordance with Criteria for speedy deletion. I'm notifying you in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding to pages that belong in it.

I tagged the category. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of tagging and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to remove the tag if you wish. However, removing the tag will not prevent deletion of the category if it remains empty.

If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with db-author.

I am a human being, not a bot, so you can contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 03:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Changes to Ben Cline page
Not to point our anything on your changes, but when a person's title is Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney, it can be safely assumed that his profession is attorney and not lawyer, as he is legally appointed to act for another entity (the state of Virginia) which is the definition of attorney and does not represent any single individual which is the definition of lawyer.

Also, University of Richmond Law and University of Richmond School of Law are interchangeable as the entity refers to itself as both, as well as Richmond Law.

Third, I'm well aware that Wikipedia is not a campaign site. However, the logo is pertinent to the title inasmuch as the article describes his campaign and election. It's as pertinent as a city seal on a city page or a logo on a company page and in no way is 'campaigning' as you seem to think.

Kelleycm (talk) 05:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Regiments of the US Army
It's the only way to keep them numerically lined up in the Inf Regts category. As you suggest, I started out with 013, 014, 015, and found the programme sorting them 1, 13, 14, 15, 16, etc, 2, 21, 22, etc. Fiddling around, a four-digit sort code seemed to fix it. Please try it and see - add a few of the the remaining regiments with three-digit sort codes only and see how the numerical order breaks down. Please do give me a hand if you can - there are still about fifty to do. Cheers Buckshot06(prof) 21:27, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Tom Gear
The link the IP was trying to add pretty clearly violates WP:BLP. You are absolutely right to remove it and I don't think any rational editor would accuse you of edit warring. At this point, there is not quite enough activity to justify protection, but, if it picks up (or you find yourself on the edge of 3RR), you can take it to Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard or ask for protection. I will add the article to my Watchlist too.-- Kubigula (talk) 04:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Michael Uebel
I have carefully reviewed the BLP verifiability standards, and am puzzled by the tag. The standard states: "all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation; material not meeting this standard may be removed. This policy extends that principle, adding that contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion." Please show what specifically is "likely to be challenged" in this BLP, and please supply full justification for that determination for likelihood. Also, I don't see anything "contentious" or libellous. What is contentious or libellous in this bio? In the meantime, I will locate some sources. What statements need support? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrSidneyGottlieb (talk • contribs) 21:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Virginia Assessments
Thank you for your recent efforts in assessing articles for WikiProject Virginia. As a result of your efforts, every article pending on the WikiProject Virginia assessment requests list has now been assessed including several articles I submitted last April or May. --TommyBoy (talk) 02:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Assessment thread at WPVA
I opened a thread at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Virginia. Thought I would drop you a note given you work in this area.-- Kubigula (talk) 04:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

MCJROTC Page.
Unless you are in the program and have your information up to date. Please refrain from removing people from positions they have earned. The last edit was intended as a joke which many in the program would have understood and found humorous. Do not edit the current update, the information is correct and what you continue to put up is not. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CadetAnnoyedByQualityOfOfficers (talk • contribs) 20:58, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Disappearance of Melissa Brannen Article
Thank you for responding to the assessment request I submitted to WikiProject Virginia for the Disappearance of Melissa Brannen article. In addition to the article assessment, I was wondering if I could some advice on which Virginia-related categories to add the article to. If you can think of any that would be appropriate in this case, please let me know or feel free to add them yourself. --TommyBoy (talk) 20:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tip, I went ahead and added the article to Category:Crime in Virginia. --TommyBoy (talk) 23:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Philip Ludwell, Sr. and Philip Ludwell, Jr.
Thanks for the information on the Ludwells. Obviously one of the sources has it wrong. Tyler says Ludwell Sr. procured the speaker position for Ludwell, Jr., making him the youngest person to hold it. I occasionally have seen more recent sources clearly get a fact wrong so even though it is usually a good bet to rely on the most recent sources, they are not always correct. I can't say which is right here, of course. Some more research is required. I hope something that might tip the balance can be found without having to spend too much time on it. I should add, however, that the quote you cite is somewhat persuasive. Donner60 (talk) 17:58, 17 February 2013 (UTC)


 * OK. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 19:16, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Manny Ramirez BLP/N
Hi Rklear. There's been no input at the BLP/N about Manny Ramirez in a couple days, so hopefully we can finish up there shortly. I of course can't edit the article since it's protected, so hopefully you can take care of it. I left you a comment in the discussion. Thanks a lot for giving your thoughts on the matter. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 13:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Update. Well, a few days have passed to allow for any comments or objections to the adjustments you and I discussed in the BLP/N about Manny Ramirez. Can you make the edits to the article? --76.189.111.2 (talk) 00:16, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Waldemar Olszewski
Hi rklear, Thanks for working on my article! I need some more help and advice. I created an article about a world known lymph specialist Waldemar Olszewski. I added to my article his main publications on the lymphatic system which are very important for his scientific profile. There is a person, his name is Captain Screebo, who deleted already twice all the publications fro my article. He says that my article is too long and if I don't stop undoing his addition (on my article!!!) he will report me and block my account. What can I do about it? Is it ok if I add those publications? They all have got PubMed index number and are important. The person who deleted all of them has no conections to medicine and has no idea what is important or not!!! Please give me an answer. Thanks! Anna Karolina Heinrich (talk) 15:16, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

War of the Triple Alliance
Exactly. Even Britannica calls it "War of the Triple Alliance" (see ). Other users pointed out similar arguments on the previous move discussions, but they were accused of ignorance and lying (or harassed with a WP:TLDR amount of text that allegedly demonstrates "recent scholarship" support for "Paraguayan War"). The "recent" trend for "Paraguayan War" is a result of Brazilianist (such as Leslie Bethell) scholars, who use a direct usage of the Brazilian perspective on the subject (From Brazil, the "Paraguayan War" is the War of the Triple Alliance). These Brazilianists are great scholars, one served as my professor and another is a good friend of mine to this day, but their trend is (at best) a sign of WP:RECENT. Perhaps in the future the term "Paraguayan War" will overshadow the traditional "War of the Triple Alliance", and (if that happens during my lifetime) I would not be opposed to the current title of the article. However, most people (especially laymen) currently know the conflict by its traditional name, and that is what should be upheld per WP:COMMONNAME. In any case, I am glad to keep finding Wikipedians such as yourself that still have that traditional memory of the "War of the Triple Alliance". It shows that we are neither ignorant or liars. Best regards.-- MarshalN20 | T al k 16:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Redundancy v. precision and accuracy
If an article says someone is a Senator, it is redundant to say they are a politician. It's better to be precise and accurate. For example, we would be better to say someone is a biologist, if that's their specialty, than to say scientist. And we wouldn't need to say they are a scientist who is a botanist. That's a given. The word politician is also a bit loaded and carries some negative connotations in the U.S. So it's best avoided in favor of specifics. Candleabracadabra (talk) 21:51, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * It's better to be comprehensive. American politician is a redirect to the article Politics of the United States, which provides a good introduction to the US federal-state system for non-US readers of the English Wikipedia (again, a large majority). We are here to provide information for the broadest possible audience, not just US political junkies. I'm putting them back, again. Rklear (talk) 22:16, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * So you're readding a misleading wikilink, one that's identified as a subject that's redundant to what's already noted in the article leads? Brilliant. As far as broadness, maybe you should note that the individuals are homo sapiens as well? Idiocy is alive and well here sadly. Make sure to include that stupidity across the board for everyone in office or running for office (even though it's not even accurate if someone isn't actually a politician yet). Have fun! Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * You're the one who's worried about keeping the word "politician" out because of "negative connotations". I guess we need alternatives for "lawyer", "banker", "preacher" and "porn star", too. Rklear (talk) 22:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If someone has made a career of politics that's one thing. But for every office holder it's unhelpful. Saying someone is a politican doesn't tell us anything worthwhile about them when we already note they are a Senator, Governor, or Representative (more specific and informative titles that have wikilnks for those needing more background). And my understanding of the English language is supported by what's in the dictionary: see http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/politician I support using the most accurate and precise words we can. Throwing around banal generalities debases the quality of this encyclopedia. Having every article about an elected  government official start out by saying they are a politician is utterly worthless. Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * In most cases, the only reason these people have sufficient notability to qualify for articles on Wikipedia is their political careers. The lede should start by saying what makes them notable, and 99% of the time, it is that they are politicians. Rklear (talk) 03:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry - missed this somehow.

I will look into creating it. I believe it has potential as a legitimate category. Perhaps not today, as I haven't the time. --15:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

More specific photo request
It's always been the intent to go "more specific", and never "less specific". Perhaps you'd care to provide a single example, and then it'd be easy to explain how it is more specific. Smiller933 (talk) 17:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Good example. Before, it was a member of Category: Wikipedia requested photographs in Virginia. Now it is a member of the sub-category Category: Wikipedia requested photographs of people of Virginia. "People of Virginia" is clearly more specific than just "Virginia". Smiller933 (talk) 22:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Those are some strong words. 1. I always review my work, and 2. I didn't botch anything. 3. No, it doesn't show "people in Virginia" on the talk page -- if you want it to, you could try asking the template maintainers nicely to add that feature. 4. The tag is less about what appears on the talk page -- it's about putting the article on a list of articles needing photographs, is it not? Take a look at Category:Wikipedia_requested_photographs_of_people_of_Virginia to see the real point. Having 1,200+ pages in a single category isn't as useful as having them sorted out into sub-categories don't you think? 5. You're not the only one here who takes pride in their work. Be careful about insulting people. Smiller933 (talk) 22:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * My edits are consistent with how those types of categorizations are typically made. 1 2 3 4 If you look at the top of the category pages for people in STATE, you'll see that is the suggested syntax as well. However, if you have an idea on how it could be done better, you can always make a polite suggestion. Smiller933 (talk) 23:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I really don't see a great value in having "Virginia" displayed within the banner on the talk page. Someone who visits the talk page and sees the image request and decides that they are interested in helping probably already knows the person is associated with Virginia, but if not, they can see the Virginia Wikiproject at the top of the page, or they could revisit the original article. On the other hand, if someone does what you suggest, that interferes with the process of sorting the 1200+ photo requests for Virginia into more-useful categories.
 * What I've done is consistent with the work of hundreds of other editors and the guidelines in place. I do think it would be nice to have "people of Virginia" in the banner if it can be done without adding a redundant category. I'd guess the editors of the reqphoto banner could add that feature if they were asked nicely. Smiller933 (talk) 01:38, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Context of Accomack County name and boundary changes
I changed text in Shires of Virginia about what became of the original 1634 Accomac Shire to be [in my opinion] more accurate. It seems appropriate to me to briefly describe the current 2013 administrative jurisdiction(s) over the land that originally formed Accomac Shire. My intended comparison was only between the original 1634 territory and the same territory now in 2013 without regard to any other intervening jurisdictional changes. I took my cue from the article's introduction, which stated:
 * five of the eight original shires were considered still extant in the Commonwealth of Virginia in essentially their same political form, although some boundaries and several names have changed

In my opinion, Accomack County exists now in the same political form (i.e. a shire/county), though with boundary changes and a name that changed away from and back again to the original. The county itself "seems to assert" that continuity on its own web site here. All of the original Shires divested territory to form new counties (there were already 15 by 1642). As you observed, this county changed its name to Northampton in 1642 (the year is important). Shortly afterwards in 1663 (important year again), most of it (68.7% of the original Shire's land area) became Accomac County again - a new county if you like, but in the same place, with the major part of the original territory, and the same name as the original (six of the original eight have an identical fate, though not through an identical path). Since splitting into two counties in 1663, there has only been a brief dissolution (1670) and two boundary adjustments (1670 land added from Maryland, 1687 land ceded to Northampton County). That dissolution in 1670 was just a mechanism by Governor William Berkeley to remove Edmund Scarborough's claimed immunity from an arrest warrant as a Burgess representing Accomac. The County was quickly restored by the General Assembly. In the particular case, the land defined by these two counties is more easily compared and contained for geographical reasons.

My interest in the Northampton connection
I know we "met" briefly recently regarding Virginia and The Western Hemisphere, but I have a personal reason for interest in this specific topic and history. The local political arch-rival of Accomac County's Edmund Scarborough was Obedience Robbins who came from the village of Long Buckby, Northamptonshire, England. In my teens, I was organist at St Botolph's Church in Church Brampton - the very next village to him, and grew up partly in nearby Chapel Brampton. These are VERY small places - current combined population is 250 people. Bizarrely (given the intervening 356 years), Obedience Robbins and I went to the same "High" School Northampton Grammar School (where he spelled his name "Robins"), and we both moved to America at age 28. I understand that he was responsible for naming Northampton County after the one in England. The need for a new name was because of events in England. The Civil War (ours not yours) started in 1642 culminating in the overthrow of the monarchy and the execution of King Charles I. That period under Oliver Cromwell was signified by a Puritan fervour in Ebgland - the ultimate authority for the hsire/county system. County names could no longer be based on the language of a non-Christian people, such as the American-Indian word Accomac. Even the pre-Christian Viking/Norse/Saxon term "Shire" itself was out of favour, officially replaced by its Norman-French synonym "County". There is a big clue about this in the first name of my compatriot. Obedience as a personal name it is almost certainly of Puritan origin. Not all of Oliver Cromwell's supporters were Puritans, byut with certainty, all Puritans were supporters of Oliver Cromwell's side of the Civil War. The ability to officially reuse the name Accomac by 1663 fits my observation too. It was after the restoration of the monarchy and just after the last of the regicide beheadings took place in England. I am aware of Virginia's loyalty to the Crown (Old Dominion), but even the local administrations in Virginia became an arm of the new Republican Parliamentarian form of government in England probably with the occasional localized support I suspect in Obedience Robbins.

I see the original Colony of Virginia administrative name change to Northampton County as a reflection of Puritan England during the interregnum rather than any separate intention to terminate the jurisdictional lineage of the original Accomac Shire. That it became two counties when the original name was allowed back again is merely a reflection of the general process of splitting into smaller divisions for a larger population that occured during those two decades. There was actually much thought that went into my tiny change to the current status of the original Accomac Shire's territory. I honestly appreciated your response that replacing "Western Hemisphere" with "New World" was not a Wikipedia minor edit along with the Wiki policy reference to help me. I quickly corrected my error with a dummy major edit. I would also appreciate your time if you can briefly explain why my original change here wasn't Wikipedia acceptable, or why my "much thought" was misguided. To me it seems more accurate and more complete. I refer to this article line as amended by me:
 * Accomac Shire (now Accomack County and Northampton County)

PS. Although I am not even American, my daughter lives and works in Amherst, VA, and on her maternal side is a tenth generation native Virginian. But I am very much aware that this and the previous article Virgina are within your territory and not mine. ChrisJBenson (talk) 11:58, 12 June 2013 (UTC)


 * My objection was not so much to tracking that split as to the fact that each of those original shires was ultimately split into smaller divisions, and that was the only such split actually included in the list. The original Elizabeth City Shire, for instance, included quite a bit of land south of James River, including the modern cities of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Virginia Beach and Chesapeake. As I see it, either all of that should be added, or none of it. The older boundaries are also ambiguous, as old boundaries are wont to be. It all gets rather messy. Rklear (talk) 12:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you. That explains it adequately. I fully understand but hadn't considered equal treatment at least for consistency. I made essentially the same change to the subsection Shire#Shires in the United States (there specifying Virginia in the location). I will revert that to the simpler single county status too. ChrisJBenson (talk) 12:58, 12 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Just snooping around to see who Rklear is, as he (I presume) challenged my changing the title of an article (I hope my response satisfied him), and I want to thank ChrisJBenson for this interesting little tit-bit of Virginian history, if Rklear will pardon my using his Talk page for that. I grew up, by the way, in what once was Warwick River Shire.  Jdcrutch (talk) 18:36, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 02:45, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 14:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators,

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Virginia Tech Project Invite
Go Hokies (talk) 04:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:International League Hall of Fame inductees has been nominated for discussion
Category:International League Hall of Fame inductees, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.RevelationDirect (talk) 00:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Virginia Tech Project Invite
Go Hokies (talk) 04:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:International League Hall of Fame inductees has been nominated for discussion
Category:International League Hall of Fame inductees, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.RevelationDirect (talk) 00:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Peer review request
At Virginia Conventions, Mojohand and TheVirginiaHistorian are trying to advance the article to GA status. Any peer review, overall critique or contribution would be welcome. Thanks in advance. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 15:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

March Madness 2017
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:


 * tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
 * updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
 * creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting
As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians
Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Simio Simulation and Scheduling Software


The article Simio Simulation and Scheduling Software has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails NCORP. The refs given are either self-published, affiliated with the company, or only mention the company in passing. May qualify for CSD G4 in light of this discussion."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. schetm (talk) 23:20, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ryan McDougle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan McDougle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ryan McDougle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 21:07, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive and create a worklist at WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list
Hi Rklear! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:42, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Correction to previous election announcement
Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)