User talk:Rkleegemtsinai

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Zolla-Pazner (March 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Susan Zolla-Pazner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  21:16, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Susan Zolla-Pazner has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Susan Zolla-Pazner. Thanks! 19:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

I moved the image, as per your suggestion.--Rkleegemtsinai (talk) 13:40, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

advice
I've started working on the article. She is unquestionably notable, as a fellow of the AAAS, but the article needs some major improvements. WP is not a place for academic CVs--we include only a few of the most important papers, as judged by some objective criteria such as citations. In describing her work, we use selected key papers or review papers only, and we do not include vague claims such as "among the first" (nor do we claim the "first" unless there is a reliable 3rd party source that says it.) We don't use words like "innumerable"--un fact, it's better to use no adjectives at all. It is assumed that any scientist goes to many meetings and serves on review boards. We do not call her Dr. except in the introductory sentence. Charlie Rose is not a Reliable source for science. And WP cannot be used as a reference. Fix all this, and resubmit. I've started, but I leave it to you to do the rest. And, if you have any connection with her or her lab, please declare the conflict of interest. If you represent Mt Sinai, see our full information about WP:Conflict of Interst and our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure, andmake the full disclosure. let me know on my user talk page when ready. Otherwise, to avoidd eletion, I'll simply summarize the basics.  DGG ( talk ) 06:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your helpful comments. As you surmise, I am connected with Mt Sinai/Susan Zolla-Pazner's lab. I work here as a medical editor, but I'm unfamiliar with the requirements of WP. I will work on the article as you suggest and resend it to you when it's ready. Again, thank you for your advice.Rkleegemtsinai (talk) 14:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, DG. Can you review my current changes and let me know if I'm on track--without it being a formal submission of the article? Rkleegemtsinai (talk) 20:50, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Susan Zolla-Pazner has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Susan Zolla-Pazner. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 01:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC) I don't see it/can't find it....Sorry, I'm new at this. Can you direct me? Thanks Rkleegemtsinai (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Zolla-Pazner has been accepted
 Susan Zolla-Pazner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! ~Kvng (talk) 15:52, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thank you so much! I will continue to review biography and other style suggestions, and upgrade and update the article as time allows.Rkleegemtsinai (talk) 16:05, 26 June 2017 (UTC)