User talk:Rknolton1


 * As mentioned at the Draft, we can only judge and base his article by WP:POLITICIAN and such unelected officials are not notable until they actually hold and are in office, there's no guarantees about it otherwise and the history shows any changes have only been cosmetic, and not what our standards actually consider notable. See [[WP:W

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rknolton1/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  01:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Keatley (February 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Keatley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Richard Keatley has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Richard Keatley. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  15:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Draft:Richard Keatley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Draft:Richard Keatley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Richard Keatley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.