User talk:Rko 0907

Do not change the casuality figures in Indo-Pakistani War of 1947
Hi There http://164.100.24.219/rsq/quest.asp?qref=60605 gives the official indian casuality figures at 1104 killed. There is no reason to change it to 3100+ killed without giving a reference and ignoring the figure in the official statement. Please do not edit the page without giving concretereferences. thank you jaiiaf 13:52, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Why not ?
hi you give the death toll at 1104 and we all know that the Indian defence ministry has always lied about its armed forces casualties even claiming to only lose 550 soldiers in the Kargil conflict while originally by international estimates the death toll was around 1000-5000 and your jaiiaf isnt that jai any ways we all know the iaf performance in the 1965 indo-pak war when the paf was clearly superior to you guys claiming 104 kills and losing only 20. fool
 * There is a list of casualities on the internet that gives the names of and addresses of all next of kin of the indian army KIA. perhaps you can show similar resources given out by pakistan army? the Pak army has never in its whole existance ever given a list of casualities. because they always cover up. Tell me where i can find the list of KIA for pak army and then i will hail you as the guru jaiiaf 13:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

hey

As you would know no army in the world releases its casualties in a war, except the indian army (funny that) all the army casualties are released by international estimates as seen in the case of the vietnam war where the international estimates show the american casualties at 53000 where as in 1987 the us army released its casualties at more than 127000. If you want to know the real indian army casualties go to onwar.com. And the iaf did lose 104 aircraft if you want to check that on globalsecurity.com. i'm not pakistani rather a kiwi(new zealander). Plz dont change the casualties of the Indo-Pak war of 1947 give the international estimates which are on onwar.com
 * and where does onwar.com gets its figurs from? whether you are a paki ro a kiwi is not my concern. but verifiability and accuracy of facts IS my concern. and whats your source that america dmitted 127000 casualities? jaiiaf 04:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

First of all your indian and you generally are biaced towards the pakistan army and its military. Onwar.com is an internationally aknowledged website containing past wars facts and casualties. The american defence secetary released it in an press conference at the white house in 1987. Onwar.com says india lost about 3000-6000 soldiers i dont know why the indian defence ministry would show only 1200 casualties since they do right the truth in your mind. plz stop putting fake references and put real estimates plz.++
 * You are talking as if the onwar.com folks counted the indian dead. dude, the link in the 47-48 war page gives the NAMES of the soldiers killed - I suppose onwar.com can do better and give us 6000 names - Unlike pakistan and other countries, India always releases the names of its dead. its a way to honour them -not disown and forget them in a foriegn land. jaiiaf 23:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Vandalising Wikipedia pages
--> You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia article, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly and you will soon be blocked from editing. If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own.

This is your first warning.Rueben lys 21:49, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

You speak like the owner of wikipedia
man if you tell me the page please, I would like to see it, you have officially reported me to wikipedia this shows your intention and that biaced behaviour you have towards the pak military. On wikipedia on my mind you should also consider the pakistani counterparts the 1500- 3000 killed the stats come from onwar.com just check that plz so why dont you show the indian kia from that website. The pakistanis were nt the only ones who left their soldiers on foreign land un attentive the indians as told by an army spokes man in pakistan left around half the dead on the hills and they were nt claimed until after the finish of the kargil war.

rko_0907

a true pakkiwi.