User talk:Rleiton

Astronomical-surveys-stub
Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha?  00:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Astronomía en Chile"
A page you created, Astronomía en Chile, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Livitup (talk) 04:46, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Image
Image:Northern Chile From Space.jpg. If this image is from NASA, it is probably in the public domain because NASA is a US Government agency, but please check. You did not give the URL of the source of the pictures, please do so. And, in order that the pictures be usable by more than one language Wikipedia, please upload them to commons. Andreas (T) 14:34, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Astronomy in Chile
A tag has been placed on Astronomy in Chile, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NuclearWarfare  contact me My work 15:27, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:SOCHIAS logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:SOCHIAS logo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:50, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Astronomy in Chile


The article Astronomy in Chile has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Page full of mostly external links. Wikilinks are duplicated by Astronomical observatories in Chile template and similar category.  Text portions are unreferenced.  Used in only one article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thetrick (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2012 (UTC)