User talk:Rls13/sandbox

= Peer Review = I think the structural changes you implemented in this draft are great. I can see this reorganization and renaming of sections (such as "Life" to "Early life and education" and "Work" to "Career" with further subheadings) to be helpful for readers in navigating the article. They also make the article carry a much more Wikipedia-like tone and make it consistent with other biographical articles on Wikipedia.

One thing I think can be improved on is the lead of the article. The lead should include something about Keynes' most notable accomplishment - or something that explains why he is deserving of a Wikipedia article at all. Right now, the lead simply identifies him by career (an English surgeon and author) and familial relation (the younger brother of John Keynes). I think adding at least sentence or two about why he is important is essential in making this a strong lead. What exactly did he accomplish that makes him deserving of a Wikipedia article? What set him apart from every other surgeon and author? --Gqcwiki (talk) 03:06, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

= Response to Peer Review = Thank you so much for this thoughtful and articulate peer review. I agree about the lead section entirely. I'm planning on adding to it to include a little about his legacy and adding a little more about why Keynes' work is/was significant. Thanks again for your input, --Rls13 (talk) 22:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)