User talk:Rmashhadi

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Rmashhadi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Hyacinth (talk) 06:54, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Thank you
Thank you dear, I realy don't think that I deserve that because I'm not that much active to recieve one of these things.Rmashhadi (talk) 00:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC)rmashhadi

<!--

I need your help.
First— I assume part of your frustration comes from the fact that Wikipedia claims to run by "consensus" (Consensus). Not by actual consensus, which, if there is a conflict, requires the agreement, and compromise, of all those involved after a discussion. Wikipedia, however, determines decisions by discussion or by vote after discussion with no requirement that everyone agree or be included. The justification for this is that it would logistically be impossible, as discussion or votes may include three to hundreds (to an endless number) of people. Getting them all to compromise and agree, especially when they are not in the same room, can be difficult.

Additionally, the decisions, once made, do not actually have to reflect or agree with policy or policies since there is, within each Wikipedia, no equivalent to a Wikipedia Supreme Court that can strike down laws, actions, and decisions of Wikipedians, projects, and lower 'courts'. Some people claim this is positive because it stops policies from being enforced mechanistically, without consideration for specific situations while others claim it is negative because it creates inconsistency and makes it hard for people to tell or remember what policies are (especially newcomers). Hyacinth (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC) [addition: 20:09, 6 July 2011 (UTC)]

Second— I assume the place to go would be the Wikimedia Foundation (http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home). Giving their page a quick scan it looks like http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Contact_us is your option.

My advice would be, if possible, to find policies of your Wikipedia that you agree with (ie, "work for you") and look up specific Wikimedia policies, if any, and use those to support your arguments or complaints. I also would remember Personal and, "Comment on the content, not on the contributor," even if you don't have that policy on your Wikipedia. For example, calling an eighteen-year-old a "boy" is an unnecessary insult and, in English, incorrect, and in the America, legally untrue (personally I would argue bringing up someone's age, whether 6 or 106, is always personal & unnecessary). Hyacinth (talk) 20:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Third— I personally wouldn't recommend it, but you may prefer to join Larry Sanger's alternative wiki-based project Citizendium where, according to Wikipedia, "Unlike Wikipedia, Citizendium does not allow anonymous editing. Participants must register under their real names with a working email address...[and] administrators, or sysops, would be called "constables", and need a bachelor's degree to qualify. He also instituted a minimum "maturity" requirement—25 years of age—for constables." Hyacinth (talk) 20:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for making time to reply me :) --Rmashhadi (talk) 09:52, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Sorry for the lengthy response, hopefully it was helpful. Hyacinth (talk) 23:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


 * no no dear it was great and clear.--Rmashhadi (talk) 23:29, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

-->

fa.wikip interwikis
Please check the equivalent articles before adding interwiki links. It takes one hell of an effort to solve these conflicts. Thanks -- Meisam (talk) 19:54, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry but I don't get it. the english article said that "Terrarium" redirects here then I connected the persian article "تراریوم" to the english one. what is exactly wrong? please correct me, if you don't mind.Rmashhadi (talk) 20:33, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * We have another article named "fa:ویواریوم" which must be linked here. By adding link to fa:تراریوم, the interwiki links get mixed up! -- Meisam (talk) 20:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * honest mistake, sorry, thank you by the way--Rmashhadi (talk) 23:39, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Moses and the Shepherd
hello! recently i came across the page for Moses and the Shepherd, which you created, while browsing Wikipedia for typographical errors. i'm currently making a few cosmetic changes to the page based on what information is available on Nazeri's website. however, i can't seem to find any reliable sources (in English) related to the album, which raises the question of whether or not is notable enough for an article on the English Wikipedia. however, i checked the article on the Farsi Wikipedia and it looks like it has quite a lot more information — though i must admit, i have no knowledge of the Persian language! if Farsi is your first language, or one you are very familiar with, perhaps you could find some suitable references related to the album in that language? if you like, i can help you incorporate information from these sources into the English page. otherwise, i do not think it will meet the criteria for a Wikipedia article — e.g. it lacks reliable sources and has questionable notability — and i would be inclined to nominate it for deletion. ~ Boomur &#91;talk&#93; 16:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)