User talk:Rmcmn

Regarding Outline
Hi, Rmcmn! I've noticed that you and another editor have been reverting each others' edits to Outline, discussing each change in edit summaries and, if I may say so, with quickly evaporating civility. I would suggest that you and the user discuss each change on the article's talk page (click "discussion" next to "article" above the article's text). Please let me know if I can be of any help!  Srose  (talk)  01:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi, GPHemesley asked for a third opinion. I have provided one on Talk:Outline. I agree with his version of outline, but I agree with you on the point that he needs to provide examples of what he is disputing. I have added the NPOV tag because the first section of the page is someone's opinion stated as fact. In the future, please explain your side of a dispute on the article's talkpage and maintain civility. Thank you, DRK 21:49, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * He didn't have a version. All he did was change the header levels and request a change of tone. I did explain that there aren't any contractions, abbreviations, or slang: meaning it's not informal.--Rmcmn 00:34, 24 September 2006 (UTC)