User talk:Rmgardner

The article Trilla G has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 18:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. See WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki 18:50, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Trilla G
A tag has been placed on Trilla G, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g10.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. AngelOfSadness talk  19:03, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Trilla G, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. AngelOfSadness talk  19:03, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people&#32;as you did at User talk:AngelOfSadness‎, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Gscshoyru 19:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * But creating an article for an non-notable band is grounds for deletion. Then you recreated it which was still grounds for deletion. Then you created the article again but decided to attack the website. I'm failing to see the joke as I'm not laughing. If you continue to make edits like this you will be blocked. And no I'm not joking around here. Also, out of curiosity, why the assumtion that I'm an emo? Is it the username because that's actually the name of a folk/country song that I happen to like. AngelOfSadness  talk  19:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Listen it may not be notable to you but how about other people. So let me guess you are the wikipedia dictator and you and only you can decide what stays and what goes. Everything was fine until you came along and deleted my post. Why have a service like this if you never let anyone use it.


 * Actually I wasn't the one to delete it and it been deleted once before I came along. You didn't assert it's importance or significance to why it should be included in wikipedia. And I don't make up the rules, I just follow them. Look at WP:BAND

if you don't believe me. AngelOfSadness talk  19:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Okay point taken we are just a small time group tryin to make it big. Sorry about that. We wernt trying to do anything wrong. Sorry bout the emo comment. I took it out.


 * Ahh apoligy accepted. Maybe once you guys hit the big time, I'll be the first to create the article or at least edit it constructively with lots of sources :D. And about the "emo" thing, I would just like to know why you said it. I know this is a strange reguest, but I would really like to know because it's the first time anyone has called me that ever. AngelOfSadness  talk  19:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Really sorry aobut the comment I just deal with a lot of people in the computer field that are a little emo and the title made it seem that way. It was a case of judging before I had all of the available information. And for that I was wrong to call you emo. Really it was just because of the title. Sorry about causing the problems today. You won't get anymore out of me. Thanks for your advice.


 * Thanks for being honest with me. At least now I can tell some of my real-life friends about it because to them I'm actually the complete opposite. Like before my username was HappiestCamper (a nickname from my friends) but I was told to change it. Don't worry about it. You are forgiven, by me anyway :D. That part made me smile a bit as at least it was original name instead of what I usually get. AngelOfSadness  talk  19:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)