User talk:Rmky87

Clairify for me, how a history of produced plays is a copyright violation?

or do you just enjoy removing information from pages people are actively working on? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CSTV (talk • contribs).

New York Knickerbockers
Good day, I noticed that you removed the {cleanup} tag from the said article. That's not the reason I am invading your talk page, rather it's the article and the Knickerbocker Rules article. The rules themselves are elaborated upon in a separate article, so I was thinking, maybe they could be wholly left out of the article on the Knickerbockers, and the article on the rules could be expanded? Just a thought. Cheers. --Ouro (blah blah) 21:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a great idea.--Rmky87 22:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. However, I do not have any time to reasonably do this, as I am exceedingly busy in real life, but I will be happy to take care of these articles next week. However, if You want to have a go, please do. Cheers. --Ouro (blah blah) 20:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Demotions
I am curious as to why you are going around Wikipedia changing the quality ratings of so many articles? I personally think you should reach some sort of consensus before doing this, as it could anger many people if you continue. LWF 03:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I started doing this after noticing that some of the FFAs V.05 ratings of Featured, which isn't right. I've been doing this to the ones that are from the former featured articles page. I've been going by what the FARs and the failed A-class reviews say. You should also notice that I've been doing it to articles that were rated B-class by someone who didn't go through the checklist. I'm glad it's there to show people that B-class doesn't just mean that you have a really long article that doesn't meet WP:WIAGA (which is honestly what I used to think). I hope that clears things up.--Rmky87 03:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your timely reply. I'm glad there is a reason, and it isn't just random. Thank you again for your time. LWF 03:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome!--Rmky87 03:36, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Medicine Collaboration of the Week
NCurs e work 16:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Just wanted to say thanks for your kind comments about my work on Quatermass II on its talk page, when passing it as a Good Article. Thanks! Angmering 19:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome.--Rmky87 20:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: your request on my talk page. I don't think I can, I'm afraid &mdash; I'm very sorry, but a) CFD is just not something I've ever had anything to do with, and it would look and bit odd if I suddenly popped up there with these, and b) it's really nothing to do with me. I think such things should be dealt with by those who know what they're doing on the admin side of Wikipedia &mdash; I'm afraid that generally speaking, aside from the odd push towards a Good or Featued article, it's something I pretty much stay away from. Sorry. Angmering 23:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Updates on TV tables
Hi Rmky87,

I see that you've been updating the tables at WP1.0 recently. I wanted to make sure that you know about the bot-generated tables at Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Television articles by quality and elsewhere. Where these is a bot generated table, we will use this first for our article selection since it is likely to be the most up-to-date. At this point, we'll mostly be using the manually generated tables when there is no bot table available.

I added a little bit to the WP:TV page to make sure people are aware of this; I think article talk pages can have assessments added at any time.

Thanks for keeping us up to date, and for your assessment work! Walkerma 16:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome.--Rmky87 17:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Assessments
Hi again! I noticed that you've re-assessed quite a few articles recently, and some such as Plato and sulfuric acid are marked as "Start". Which WikiProject's criteria are you using to assess these? I know that the WP:Chem definition of B-Class doesn't require references, indeed some tagged by the project as B have no refs at all, yet you marked this as "Start" on the basis of references. Are there specific topics that are missing from the sulfuric acid article? (Note that WP:Chem actually invented the assessment scheme!) I'm aware that some projects such as WP:MILHIST use tighter criteria, but many don't.

Also, you might be interested in helping us with a new direction at a 1.0 project, WP:WVWP, which is designed to get unassessed articles assessed and tagged. We're focusing on articles that have no parent WikiProject (so none of the above worries!), and looking at some of the more important topics first. We're using these guidelines. Would you be interested in helping with this? We'd appreciate your energy! Thanks, Walkerma 22:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Assessments II
Hi, thank you for taking the time to assess a number of articles within WikiProject Abortion! I disagreed with you on two assessments, though, History of abortion and Beginning of pregnancy controversy. "History..." has more in common with articles in Category:B-Class Abortion articles than it does with Category:Start-Class Abortion articles, and, I feel, the level of sourcing is far ahead of that in other abortion-related articles; "Beginning...", I feel, has some unresolved OR issues that need to be taken into account. Hope you don't mind. -Severa (!!!) 14:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Joanna Christie
Thanks for tagging the Joanna Christie page properly. I'm still feeling my way with Wikipedia, so your help is much appreciated. Gringotsgoblin 20:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Gringotsgoblin

Oklahoma City bombing
Just a few questions about you removing the peerreview tag on the article. How is the article peer review over? I have only received a response from the bot. Is there a time limit on the peer review? --Nehrams2020 08:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The last response is dated February 19; the GAnominee tag has been up since February 25.--Rmky87 12:36, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Go Board Game
Hi, are you happy with the URL changes we made to the page? If not let us know. Thanks, --ZincBelief 11:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, why you revert the explanation of original meaning of go game that just added ;-) --Jarodtang
 * Because the prose was poor.--Rmky87 18:52, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * As a Chinese who practice go game for 15 years, and found many westerners weird about the "go" game, it's reasonable to explain the meaning of the original game name, isnt it?. And I also found that after the explain, the western guys get better understanding about the game faster ;).--Jarodtang —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 05:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Assessments III
Thanks for takign the time to assess WikiProject EastEnders] articles! Just out of interest, why have you rated Angie Watts as "Start" and Pete Beale as "B"? What is the major difference? -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 17:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Peter Beale has a citation after almost every paragraph. I was going by the MILHIST criteria.--Rmky87 17:02, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I have just noticed that you did this and also wanted to say thanks - I think the members of the EastEnders project (myself included) have been lazy in assessing the articles! &mdash; AnemoneProjectors (talk) 20:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome.--Rmky87 20:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

It's March also on my calendar
However, I just 'moved' the maintenace tags from Simon Young to its 'children' (first time that I saw such a double person page) and left also the date at February. Anyway, it doesn't matter as long as the tags help...Ciao. Tikiwont 18:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:Firefly
Oh, Rmky87, I am really really sorry, I should've done that, and if I could do it over, I wouldn't do it.. Again, I apologize, and in the future I will not do that, please forgive me (not being sarcastic).. Illyria05 (Talk • Contributions) 05:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'm glad :) .. Oh, also, I set up Firefly Reception and Firefly Production for deletion, since no pages link to them.. Again, I apologize, I should've used the talk page.. Anyway, I'm happy that both of us were able to settle this :) .. Have a nice day.. Oh, also, I'm starting a topic on the Firefly talk page, I suggest you check it out when I start it.. Thanks, and I hope that we run into each other again sometime.. Illyria05 (Talk • Contributions) 05:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

GA review
Hi, Rmky87! Thanks for reviewing Vitamin C; I've main the changes you suggested...is that all it needed for promotion? — Jack · talk · 19:57, Friday, 9 March 2007

Lawyer GA on hold
Nehrams2020 22:27, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

British Pharmacopeia
Thanks for the wikification. Ddruk 09:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

McCarthy, McCarthyism
I am inviting all recent editors of Joseph McCarthy to comment on a current dispute. User:KarlBunker, in his stated view out of concern for WP:NPOV, has reverted, deleted, and selectively reinstated factually accurate sourced information that I have added. I contend he is in error. Please see the discussion at Talk:Joseph McCarthy. Thank you. Kaisershatner 17:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Ho and others
Thanks for the pointer. I don't know what you thought might possibly be insulting about it. You have underscored one fact for me--doing a proper article on low-budget commercial cinema will really require people with familiarity in all these little genres from around the world, like the one you've raised here. There's so much to learn.—DCGeist 17:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: What on earth is this supposed to mean?
I would be interested in learning what standards they applied in forming their claim that the anticonvulsants in question were administered at "average dose levels". They were probably radically different, depending on the needs of the patient. This is a relatively small population, too. But, nonetheless, it does seem to prove that certain anticonvulsants have a significant pharmacological interaction with glucaric acid (all of the anticonvulsants mentioned, except valproate, increased levels of some unspecified enzyme, which had the effect of incresing glucaric acid excretion). However, there is no page for glucaric acid, and the closest article is about a broad class of sugar acids (discussed on the page Aldaric acid). I am unsure of any medical (or other) uses of these compounds, so I really wonder what the point of this study was. Fuzzform 23:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Recent comment : is scientific peer review over on the ascorbate page?
Hi! You removed the tag on peer review and I just have a question ot two, I don't understand: who were these reviewers? How can we tell they left? What does it mean (that they left?). Please spare some time to explain to me this... Thanks in advance. Pierre-Alain Gouanvic 07:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Andrew
That other image is not a screenshot. It's a promotional photo released by ABC for the second season episode "I Know Things Now." --DrBat 20:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

ibid
Thanks for the advice - I had already noticed that when I was creating & editing the article... don't know why I didn't just remove them all then! I'll insert the full references asap. EyeSereneTALK 20:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome.--Rmky87 21:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Review closings
Hey, Rmky87, just wanted to leave you a note to review the discussion on Marskell's page; when editors update the articlehistory on fac and far closings, it makes for extra work for the bot operator. If a FAC or FAR hasn't been closed, you can leave a note on Gimmetrow's talk page. Thanks for the help! Sandy Georgia (Talk) 14:12, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Krypton
GA-level articles should be set to B-level, as GA is not a level on the Chemistry assessment scale, nor are GAs tracked by Wikibot 1.0. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 17:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Hurricane Frances (2004) article
See if it looks B class now. Thegreatdr 19:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurse work 21:06, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

The Big O: second peer review
The Big O is going through a second peer review. The purpose of the review is to learn what's needed for it to become a featured article. Your input is welcomed.--Nohansen 17:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 19:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability
You recently edited an article for Dekker Dreyer... the article is up for deletion based on notability, and I would like to ask you to chime in on the discussion of that deletion. Wikimegamaster 22:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Request help, ABA article
I'm assuming that you're the friend Kassiane told me about. I am wondering if you could help me with an edit war I'm currently in. I am attempting to make sure that the Applied behavior analysis article includes criticism however two practitioners are attempting to revert all critical edits. I could use any and all assistance you would be able to give. Thank you.--Ensrifraff 19:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Could you tell me their names? I want to know who to revert.--Rmky87 19:17, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
For your cpedits to Western Ganga Dynasty and Western Chalukya literature where I had by mistake removed a few citations.thanksDineshkannambadi 22:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC) You're welcome.--Rmky87 22:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Karnataka
Sir, currently this article is undergoing copy edits to promote it to Peer review. The intent of removing citations was that the citations exist in the subarticles and as per wiki rules, the same citations do not have to appear on the main article also. User:Gnanapiti has been working hard to make the size of the article acceptable for PR and FAC. There is nothing wrong in what he is doing. We are all a part of the Karnataka work group who have been working on this article for about 2 months to make it a FA. There is NO foul play here. thank you.Dineshkannambadi 00:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Rmky87:Thank you for your revert in Karnataka article. In the end, that helped much. I actually reverted your edit, assuming you thought User:Gnanapiti removed all those references unilaterally. However, after seeing your message in User:Dineshkannambadi's talk page, I realized that there are few broken links. In fact there were several (four, to be specific). :-)
 * I have corrected all of them, and have re-inserted the missing references back. Thank you again! - KNM Talk 01:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you very much for partaking in my effort to have a listing of stable article revisions. How do you suggest we get this project off the ground? (messedrocker • talk) 03:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * They don't have to be featured, they just need to cite their sources, be accurate, free of bias, and free of original research. (messedrocker • talk) 15:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * They've become old. (messedrocker • talk) 16:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Revisions should be as recent as possible and they should follow the requirements. (messedrocker • talk) 16:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Could this fit in somewhere? (plus my reply)
My article-writing skills aren't the best right now and I don't often know which bits of information really matter and I'm wondering about this:

Relationship of Parent and Child Informants to Prevalence of Mania Symptoms in Children With a Prepubertal and Early Adolescent Bipolar Disorder Phenotype

It basically says that children do become euphoric while manic and that those studies didn't find that should have asked the children instead of just their parents.--Rmky87 17:17, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, as far as the article goes itself I agree it is very sensible to include children's POV in assessing mental state. However, bipolar disorder in children is very rare and the fact that it has such as significant section in the Bipolar Disorder article is one I'm not sure how to address. After taking a good look at the article there is a large amount of material which is going to be a headache to reorganize. Given the length of the article if you want to stick it in as a one-liner should be ok but it isn't earth-shattering. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks, I'm using a shortcut work in the past, but I gues that was just for FA, GA and GAC. Gran2 17:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey
I want to send you a private message, but you don't have an e-mail address registered with your Wikipedia account. How could I contact you? MessedRocker (talk) 21:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Go to Special:Preferences and set an e-mail address. MessedRocker (talk) 02:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Notification of AFD for Harjinder Singh Khurana
I have put Harjinder Singh Khurana up on Articles for deletion. Since you have contributed to the article you may wish to comment at the discussion-- Cailil  talk 17:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

RE: French primidone article
I might be able to find it at one of the several university or public libraries in the area. My guess is that the Harvard libraries have access to it, and perhaps also the BPL (these are 2 of the 3 largest libraries in the country; one of the many perquisites of Boston). I'm bogged down in work at the moment, but I'll certainly help you locate it as soon as I have a free moment. Fuzzform 23:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

RE: history section of the primidone article
This is by far the longest history section I have ever seen in any drug-related article; quite an interesting progression of opinions regarding the best drugs for epilepsy. However, some of the information seems to belong in an article concerning the history of drug treatments for epilepsy, rather than in the primidone article. The information about other drugs manufactured by the same company that manufactures primidone is a bit tangental (though it does serve to illustrate why the drug fell out of mainstream use). I'm not sure where you'd move this kind of information, though.

Quite amazing, by the way, how far you've brought this article since its creation a couple years ago. Fuzzform 00:26, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

RE: Chinese primidone article
Hmm... I do have a friend who speaks Mandarin fluently, but I'm not sure whether or not she could read a scientific article. I'll certainly ask, next time I see her. (But, even then, would her translation be a valid source?) As for favors in general... I feel that they ultimately benefit everyone who uses Wikipedia, so feel free to ask me anytime (though I may not get to everything in a very timely manner). Fuzzform 04:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Articles requested
A preliminary search has uncovered one of the articles you requested. The others will be more of a challange, but I'll keep looking. Send me a wikipedia email with your address, and I'll send you the pdf. Fuzzform 21:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * It's in the toolbox on the lower left. Fuzzform 22:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * It's right under the search box. You have to be on my main user page, then it should appear right below the "contributions" and "log" options. Fuzzform 22:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Vique Simba
An article that you have been involved in editing, Vique Simba, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Simba Recordings. Thank you. Optigan13 07:34, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

RE: Regarding Denis Williams 1956
Yes, all of the information presented in this paper would be considered open-label. I would hardly call it a "study" or a "trial", since it doesn't include control groups of any kind (that would be unethical in the context of outpatient treatment). This would better be described as a collection of case studies. It might be citable, in some way, in the phenobarbital article, though certain statements are clearly outdated (e.g. phenobarbital is no longer a first line treatment for epilepsy). Fuzzform 21:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Primidone approval
I'm not able to read the German article. The first article says it "has been used since 1950" and that 1952 was the first clinical trial. This seems quite consistent with the Epilepsy Action source that it was approved in 1952, which would seem to be unlikely before any clinical trials. The anticonvulsant article lists first approved usage rather than first experimental or first clinical usage. The latter dates would be rather hard to source without detailed a drug development history. Do you think the dates in anticonvulsant are wrong?

Your Primidone article is clearly a labour of love. I've enjoyed reading some of your sources too. Quite shocking the number of highly toxic drugs that were launched and then quietly forgotten. Colin°Talk 20:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi Rmky87. Saw your note on User talk:Awadewit (nothing escapes your attention? :-) and reply on my talk page (I assume you were the IP). You are better informed wrt anticonvulsants than I am. I think your 1950 date could well be right (the source is ambiguous) and I wouldn't revert you if you changed anticonvulsant to use that date with your source. History always involves a big of guesswork.

I assume from your work that pharmacy is your speciality and anticonvulsants a particular interest. Is this an area you'd like to help with on epilepsy as editor/reviewer/fact-checker/whatever? DO11.10 has offered to look into the "Mechanism" section, which has an overlap with how anticonvulsants work. Perhaps you can work together to come up with a lay-reader-friendly explanation, because it certainly makes my head hurt. Colin°Talk 20:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

If beautiful lay-reader-friendly prose isn't your strong point, I'm sure there are other ways you could help if you want to. For example, as a reviewer, or to suggest some good sources. See you around wiki. Colin°Talk 12:26, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Suicidality and Antiepileptic Drugs
Can you look at my note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. I think you might be able to help. Thanks. Colin°Talk 14:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Hydantoins
A tag has been placed on Template:Hydantoins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:36, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:GABA analogs
A tag has been placed on Template:GABA analogs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Valproylamide anticonvulsants
A tag has been placed on Template:Valproylamide anticonvulsants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Oxazolidinedione anticonvulsants
A tag has been placed on Template:Oxazolidinedione anticonvulsants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Urea anticonvulsants
A tag has been placed on Template:Urea anticonvulsants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Bromides
A tag has been placed on Template:Bromides requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Never change a running system
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Never change a running system, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Never change a running system. B. Wolterding (talk) 13:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Wikify from March 2007
I have nominated wikify from march 2007 for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:32, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

No content in Category:Wikify from December 2006
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Wikify from December 2006, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Wikify from December 2006 has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Wikify from December 2006, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Solar System
nominated Solar system for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.
 * I should have done this MUCH earlier! First time - learning & living! HarryAlffa (talk) 19:32, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Samurai Deeper Kyo characters
I have nominated samurai deeper kyo characters for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 19:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Samurai Deeper Kyo
I have nominated samurai deeper kyo for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 19:40, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Swedish literature
This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed at Talk:Swedish literature/GA1. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

The Big O GAR
As a major contributor to The Big O, I thought you'd want to know that that article is currently under going a Good Article Reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps. The article currently fails the good article criteria, as detailed at Talk:The Big O/GA1. Its reassessment is on hold for seven days to allow time for the issues to be addressed. Thanks. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 01:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Wikipedians in Russell, Ontario
Category:Wikipedians in Russell, Ontario,, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. VegaDark (talk) 02:08, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Yeast
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Yeast/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:59, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Fructose derivative anticonvulsants


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:41, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Immunology
I see you have edited some of the pages within the scope of immunology. Please have a look at the proposal for a WikiProject Immunology WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Immunology and give your opinion (support or oppose). Thank you for your attention.  Kinkreet ~&#9829;moshi moshi&#9829;~ 09:39, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Global account
Hi Rmky87! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox House (TV series) season 3 episode list


A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox House (TV series) season 3 episode list requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Deprecation of this form of template per result of discussion at Template talk:Infobox television episode

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --  Alex TW 08:35, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

"Orbital maneuvering system" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Orbital maneuvering system. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bicyclic antidepressants


A tag has been placed on Category:Bicyclic antidepressants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 03:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC)