User talk:Rmmcgill

Speedy deletion of ILearning
A tag has been placed on ILearning, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Dom the dude 001 23:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Infoboxes
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Adam McCormick 01:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

5 i philosophy
A template has been added to the article 5 i philosophy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. P4k 02:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 5 i philosophy
A tag has been placed on 5 i philosophy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 21:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of ILearning
A tag has been placed on ILearning, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 21:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Ross Morrison McGill
Hi there. I thought I'd leave a note explaining a few editing norms on Wikipedia of which you may not be aware that relate to Ross Morrison McGill and the relevant discussion at Articles for deletion/Ross Morrison McGill. Given the substantially similar areas of interest and editing patterns, I am assuming that this account is operated by the same person who has been editing these two pages with the IP address 81.100.129.161. If this is mistaken, please let me know on my talkpage. I hope this isn't too overwhelming, if you have any questions or want anything clarified, I would again welcome you to ask on my talkpage. Happy editing! -- Lear's Fool 04:11, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Firstly, please do not alter remarks made by other users on discussion pages, as was done here on the deletion discussion page. There are a very limited number of situations where this is appropriate, listed here, but it is never appropriate to change comments made by others so as to change what they were trying to say.
 * If you would like to participate in the deletion discussion, you may want to read the relevant guideline beforehand, and then participate my making your own comments rather than changing comments by others. You do not need to worry that much about formatting, I would be happy to fix anything you post, and if you would like some advice on how to put forward a convincing argument, please let me know on my talkpage and I'd be happy to help
 * Within articles, if you wish to link to another page within Wikipedia, simply find the article title and place it within two square brackets. For example, to link to Wikipedia, I would type , not  .  The second type of linking is reserved to links to pages outside Wikipedia, so called "external links"
 * External links are typically not linked to within articles. For example, if you refer to degree program within an article (as you did with the BA in design tech and education), it should not be linked to an external site within the body of the article, although it may be linked to a Wikipedia article on the topic.  If you wish to add relevant external links, this should typically be done in an "External links" section at the bottom of the article.
 * Finally, though this was probably an honest mistake, it is not appropriate to edit within the same subject area with multiple accounts (eg an IP address and a registered account) when any connection between the accounts has not been disclosed. This is referred to as sock puppetry, and makes interacting with editors difficult, and can be seen as an effort to deceive others.  It is easy to edit having forgotten to log in, and this is probably what happened here, but please be aware that it can make things difficult for others.