User talk:Rmulle92

March 2010
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to World Trade Center. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. –Turian  ( talk )  18:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I was removing the content that was NOT neutral. It has not been proven that the planes were flown by Al Qaeda. Stating that the "SUSPECTS" (key word there) were Al Qaeda and were the ones who flew planes into the towers, that is not a neutral point of view.

thank you.


 * It was indeed your personal analysis. The statement you removed is supported by the vast preponderance of reliable sources, and your comment above indicates that you are interested in inserting conspiracy theories.   Acroterion  (talk)  19:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

It is not 'conspiracy theory'. It is a national debate in which 42% of people believe there are unanswered questions and omitted truths. Theory is not something that widely accepted. The official story is the theory here. And if the official story is doubted by 42% of Americans, then how can you publish it as such a solid truth?

Dov S. Zakheim
I have reverted your edits to Dov S. Zakheim. Please refrain from slander, libel, ridiculous insinuations, vandalism, and promoting your personal analysis and point of view. That is not what wikipedia is for. --198.179.142.6 (talk) 15:23, 9 April 2010 (UTC)