User talk:Rmzadeh/Archives/2011/March

Warning
You can not remove speedy tags from the articles which have been written by yourself.--94.182.108.127 (talk) 13:17, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * you can not set an speedy tag to an article that had one already, 3 years ago! read the rules, and you do not set speedy tags for personal vengeance, read the rules ip!  Rmzadeh  ►  17:20, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Your user page
Hi, Rmzadeh. I was wondering if you would please remove the Rollback template from your user page, as you do not at this time have that right? Thank you. -- Diannaa (Talk) 19:49, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, I saw rollback functionality while editing history, so I was under the impression I had rollback, I guess I don't?  Rmzadeh  ►  19:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I guess this is just a misunderstanding: Twinkle offers similar functionality but is techically different from core rollback, which is for some reason regulated a lot more. Zakhalesh (talk) 19:53, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Understood, I'll apply for it someday  Rmzadeh  ►  23:46, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It's under my understanding that Twinkle's "rollback" feature is mainly unregulated because it's noticeably slower than core rollback (it uses browser code to execute the rollback versus a server function). It also requires an edit summary to be given, outside of the vandalism option which is self-explanatory, which is probably best for most cases when an edit needs to be undone. Since it doesn't leave a descriptive edit summary, core rollback is generally only supposed to be used in very specific cases. I have core rollback and I actually find myself using Twinkle's rollback much more often because of this.  elektrik SHOOS  04:35, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * :)  Rmzadeh  ►  11:32, 31 March 2011 (UTC)