User talk:Rnb103

April 2021
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Virgil van Dijk—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 17:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Virgil van Dijk. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 17:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

It’s by no means vandalism or unconstructive. It’s adding a piece of information that is praise and a popular opinion among the footballing world. It said that before but someone has removed it, wether it be you or someone else I don’t know. I feel it’s disrespectful and ‘unconstructive’ to remove it Rnb103 (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Virgil van Dijk, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Virgil van Dijk was changed by Rnb103 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879011 on 2021-04-11T17:33:01+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Then who is allowed to edit without being accused of vandalism? What’s the point in letting people edit when they’re not even aloud to insert information? What a joke Rnb103 (talk) 17:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)