User talk:Rnicraje

September 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abby Lee Miller has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:07, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Abby Lee Miller was changed by Rnicraje (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857372 on 2016-09-20T07:07:56+00:00.

The recent edits you made to Maddie Ziegler constitute WP:Edit warring and have been reverted. Please do not continue to WP:Edit war. Instead, use the Talk page to describe your intentions, and engage the other editors who work on the page to discuss with you the best course of action. Thank you. -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:30, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Maddie Ziegler shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  General Ization  Talk   15:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Maddie Ziegler. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  General Ization  Talk   15:36, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   15:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Widr (talk) 16:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Maddie Ziegler. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  General Ization  Talk   18:33, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Attention
Please stop edit warring. Discuss your changes on the article's talk page with other editors. If you continue edit warring, you will be blocked again and for a longer period. Widr (talk) 18:38, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, Rnicraje. When you add new information to Wikipedia, you must cite your sources. Please see WP:V for more information The recent edit you made to Maddie Ziegler has been reverted, as did not cite a source. If you have a published, reliable source for the information, please discuss it on the article's Talk page. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Please do not add references to the IMDB. See WP:CITEIMDB.  IMDB is not a reliable source for Wikipedia purposes, because its content is user-submitted.  However, it can be used as an external link for articles about movies. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)