User talk:Rnkroy/Archive 1

India edits
Hi Raunak – no, it wasn't because of any bias in your edits that it was reverted. The India article is a featured article on Wikipedia, and needs to be complaint Wikipedia's standards for featured articles. Most FA articles are written in summary style and, in the case of Indian articles, conform to WP:INCITIES. While the content you added was interesting, it didn't conform to summary style and include citations to support any statements of facts. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks AreJay (talk) 15:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

About India and and other stuff.
Hi Rnkroy,

Welcom to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoyed working on WIkipedia and will continue to do so. Since you are a new user you have a bit to learn about how things work around here. So let me state a few points.

- #It seems that you have created two ID's. Normally a user is not allowed to do so.However since you are anew user, it is not really a problem as long as you use only one ID to edit, henceforth. - #if you have a content dispute reagrding an article it would be better if you post a message regardingit on the articles' talk page instead of individually contacting different users on their talk page. This is also better when multiple editors are involved as it gives others an oportulity to state their points. - Hope this helps.--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 05:44, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) I hope you have read the welcome message above, and the links provided in it. If you haven't then please take some time to read them as it will help you understand Wikipeda policies and rules.
 * 2) In case you want to practice editing or simply fool around until you gain a grip on editing you can use the Sandbox . Edits made in the sandbox are not subject to any rules. A good place to practice Wiki syntax.
 * 3) There are some dos and donnts on Wikipedia. It would be helpul if you read What Wikipedia is and What Wikipedia is not.
 * 1) Regarding the India article,please understand that Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for anything and everything you like. I know I sound rude, but that is not my intention. A lot of newcommers get upset when thier edits are removed or changed. All edits are subject to srutiny, re-editing and removal. The content that you added was not really helpfull. Mentioning the names of the entire 1983 team etc does not really add anything of value to the article. Besides ,a rticles must be consise and summary-style, so simply elongating the sports section to talk about one world cup victory deoes not look good. Please look around and you can probably find an article on the 1983 WC victory.  #Regarding the India article,please understand that Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for anything and everything you like. I know I sound rude, but that is not my intention. A lot of newcommers get upset when thier edits are removed or changed. All edits are subject to srutiny, re-editing and removal. The content that you added was not really helpfull. Mentioning the names of the entire 1983 team etc does not really add anything of value to the article. Besides ,a rticles must be consise and summary-style, so simply elongating the sports section to talk about one world cup victory deoes not look good. Please look around and you can probably find an article on the 1983 WC victory.

talk page
I deleted your early edits but I restored the warnings and messages from other users. They need to stay. Thanks, Sarah 08:22, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Userpage
As requested, I have deleted your userpage. It appears your user talk page has already been deleted by Sarah, so I have left that one be. Please get in touch with me again, if you'd like your userpage restored at any time. Regards, Anthøny  11:04, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi,GUI
Thank you for your message. However, I was not asking for the meaning of "GUI", I  was simply refering to the strange word "guoey" (or whatever that... hm, unpronouncable word was) used to illustrate the pronounciation. --arny (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Re:Re: GUI Yes, that indeed may be an error which a native English speaker would make, but as a non-native en speaker I am immune to such errors - I naturally read it as intended :). However, maybe the pronounciation proposition should be written differently, because if I didn't already know how to read it, it wouldn't help much. --arny (talk) 14:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Account Creation Interface
-- FastLizard4 (Talk•Index•Sign) 06:07, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Answers

 * Answers. Good luck!! --Bhadani (talk) 01:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)