User talk:RoAlFuGr

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Errol orang good4498abc.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Errol orang good4498abc.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:21, 23 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:21, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Great Auk Errol.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Great Auk Errol.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Errol train station2.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Errol train station2.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Snowman (talk) 22:25, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Errol snooker painting2.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Errol snooker painting2.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Snowman (talk) 22:28, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: File:Great_Auk_Errol.jpg
An image you uploaded is being discussed on, and may be deleted. You are welcome to advance the discussion there. Snowman (talk) 09:54, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Persmission
Hi, permission to use images made by others than yourself has to be registered through this process: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/OTRS FunkMonk (talk) 21:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank You, this was very useful. RoAlFuGr (talk) 23:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Errol train station2.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Errol train station2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 11:37, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Errol Fuller for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Errol Fuller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Errol Fuller until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bender235 (talk) 15:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Images needing permission
If Errol Fuller gave permission for a the artworks listed below to be released under Creative Commons licenses, this needs evidence of permission, which can be sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org (see Donating copyrighted materials).
 * File:A Last Stand.jpg
 * File:John the Revelator.jpg
 * File:The Lurker in the Dark.jpg Thank you, &mdash;innotata 14:29, 12 April 2011 (UTC)