User talk:Roa-brown

helpme

The Stamford Brook entry, wrongly claims that the Bollo brook joins it. This is not the case, and indeed contradicts the separate entry on the Bollo ( given with a source). (The Bollo crosses and Uxbridge road (at the boundary between W3 and W5) then down under Bollo Lane, through the grounds of Chiswick House (previously through the lake) and into the Thames in its own channel - all far to the west of the Stamford Brook).

I tried to correct the entry by removing the incorrect part on the Bollo, and without giving a source as there could be no source given for what was no longer there. I then got error messages, and am stuck, as I continue to get error messages for further corrections or even attempts to go back to the original. There seems to be no way to remove incorrect information whose absence requires no explanation without giving a source. I seem unable to restore the entry to what it was or to remove the error message. I find the site confusing and am stuck.
 * You successfully removed the entry on this edit. However you removed the first use of a particular reference in the form   When you see a reference like this, it is a way of giving a name to a reference so that it can be used again later in the article without repeating the code and having a sparate entry by just typing anywhere later in the article   But you removed the first usage so you left just the latter part in the article with no reference text. I fixed that with this edit. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)