User talk:Roadbloack

December 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 18:35, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Looking at the user's contribution history, I was only able to spot a sockpuppet at Anna M. M. Vetticad, where they don't appear to have engaged in any edit warring or phony consensus-building. Requesting Bbb23's comment in case I've missed anything, but based on what I have seen I'm inclined to accept this request. signed,Rosguill talk 20:35, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * , I'd be hesitant to unblock without a clearer (and more convincing) explanation about this editor's rationale for creating a second account. I don't see any reason why one would need a second account because one has a second e-mail address. I'll add that they seem to have a very particular interest in Anna M. M. Vetticad, which may indicate a WP:COI: here they are adding a review of hers to an article about a film; and again; and again; and again; this series of diffs includes other stuff, but again at the end we have some of Vetticad's comments. I haven't looked at every single edit from both accounts, but I haven't found a single one yet which are not quoting Vetticad in one way or another. Girth Summit  (blether)  18:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Roadbloack, can you respond to the above concerns? signed,Rosguill talk 19:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)