User talk:Roadconstruction1

September 2018
Hello, I'm Zachary Schr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Black Panther (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. FiberTech (talk) 15:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Eighth Grade (film)
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:06, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at Finding Nemo. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:38, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Booksmart plot
The Plot section you wrote is substantially similar to another website. Did you write this yourself? Ribbet32 (talk) 02:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Yes I did. I went to an early screening and that website probably copied off of Wikipedia if you ask me.

A Clockwork Orange
Hi-please don't change spelling from one variant to another, as you did here. The other edits were not good, either, but the spelling changes were flat-out disruptive. NEDOCHAN (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

You should also stop marking your edits as minor when they're not. NEDOCHAN (talk) 10:34, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Copyright violations
One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. 173.209.178.244 (talk) 19:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (film). You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:29, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Hi--I reverted your edits on Requiem for a Dream because they added unnecessary detail and subtly changed some meaning (e.g., linking to prostitution to describe a character's action is interpretive, not descriptive). I can see you've been warned before about following WP guidelines about plots; remember when you're reverted that the correct action is to discuss, not to reinstate your preferred version. Doing so is considered to be edit warring. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and edit warring, or using edit summaries like this, are not acceptable. Grandpallama (talk) 18:36, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Sophie Turner, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  17:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! 220  of  ßorg 13:52, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at Scream (1996 film). You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 00:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to The Americans appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CastJared (talk) 14:35, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)