User talk:Roadpine22

Welcome!
Hello, Roadpine22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Joshua Jonathan -  Let's talk!  09:01, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
another one. Joshua Jonathan -  Let's talk!  09:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Please stop your tendentious editing. Neutrality is policy here. For sourcing, please note especially that Wikipedia itself can never be used as a source. Bishonen &#124; tålk 09:37, 3 December 2023 (UTC).


 * what is the problem here just correcting the actual history Roadpine22 (talk) 09:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * No, you are trying to get articles to conform with pseudohistory and changing text so it didn't match the source. Doug Weller  talk 10:05, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * The problems are that you remove well-sourced neutral content, as you did here, and that you use Wikipedia itself as a source, as you did here (where you also messed up the syntax in several places; please be more careful). Bishonen &#124; tålk 10:07, 3 December 2023 (UTC).
 * the problem is mughals did suppressed cultures but it is shown as some kind inavders. this is not proper history at all. this is misleading to many. if someone edits the nazis as good people will you agree with that too. Roadpine22 (talk) 11:31, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * invaders* Roadpine22 (talk) 11:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia goes by reliable sources exclusively, not by the views of "many". Bishonen &#124; tålk 13:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC).
 * what reliable source you think foreigners can make up their own source and they are true Roadpine22 (talk) 14:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I linked the words reliable sources to our guideline on reliable sources. I guess you didn't click on my link. Here it is again. Try clicking on it. To edit here, you need to abide by our policies and guidelines. Wikipedia is an international encyclopedia, and nobody's a "foreigner" here. Bishonen &#124; tålk 15:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC).