User talk:Roadsendfilms

Conflict of interest
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (Roadsendfilms) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this :
 * 1) It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization.
 * 2) Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Mrmatiko (talk) 18:13, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shakespeare Unplugged


A tag has been placed on Shakespeare Unplugged, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mrmatiko (talk) 18:13, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Cold River Rising
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cold River Rising, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://enessmith.com/index.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 18:25, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cold River Rising


A tag has been placed on Cold River Rising requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Slon02 (talk) 18:28, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – Athaenara ✉  23:14, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

No, you have a clear conflict of interest there. You won't be unblocked to continue violating WP:COI and WP:PROMO. If this is your only intention, this is the end of the line. Otherwise, convince us you understand why you won't be unblocked to write about that. Be warned, you likely only have one more chance. --Yamla (talk) 17:34, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Yamla, I appreciate your desire to keep COI and PROMO off Wiki and I'm not here to violate either of those. I won't deny that I am connected to the company that produced this show however my intentions to update the Destination America page and list it under 'current programming' is based on a desire to keep that page relevant and free of errors. Quite a few of the shows listed under 'current programming' are inaccurate and I think it does a disservice to the reader to get out of date information. If I can not be the one to submit pages for the show and the host, that's fine. Again, I'm not looking for free advertising. Just trying to help. I might also, for example, update the AKC National Championship page with some additional information regarding the 2019 show, just because I think readers might appreciate some additional insight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roadsendfilms (talk • contribs)
 * Can you clarify something for me? When you say "I'm not looking for free advertising", do you mean that you were looking for free advertising but are no longer doing so, or that you never were looking for free advertising? JBW (talk) 00:42, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for answering my question. It was the answer I expected, but I gave you a chance to prove me wrong, so that an unblock could be considered, but you didn't take up that chance. If had not already declined your unblock request, I would be declining it now. If you honestly think that you were "not looking for free advertising" when you made the edits that led to the block, then you are so unable to see the nature of your own writing that you are unlikely ever to be able to edit in an acceptable way. The editing that led to the block was pure and unambiguous advertising copy. JBW (talk) 23:36, 24 April 2020 (UTC)