User talk:Roanukz

Peer Review from Wen Xu
-

_______________
 * 1) Quality of Information: 1 (Can explain more in detail)
 * 2) Article size: 1 (Less than expected)
 * 3) Readability: 2
 * 4) Refs: 1 (Not enough citations)
 * 5) Links: 1 (Not enough links)
 * 6) Responsive to comments: 2
 * 7) Formatting: 1 (No title and some citations are strangely located)
 * 8) Writing: 2
 * 9) Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
 * 10) Outstanding: 1 (Easy to read but not attractive and informative enough)

Total:   14    out of 20

Thank you for the review, I have fixed the problems you pointed out. Check out the new page and feel free to let me know what you think. Roanukz (talk) 02:43, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC UNC (biology) was accepted
 UNC (biology), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:32, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Please avoid overlinking and disambiguation page linking.
Greetings! I noticed that in UNC (biology), you tended to go way overboard in linking terms. Please review OVERLINK with respect to the points that everyday words that will be understood in context, like "defect" should not be linked, and that "a link should appear only once in an article". Also, please be careful to avoid linking to disambiguation pages like Guidance, Orientation, Terminal, Binding, and Proliferation, and instead link to the actual article that discusses the topic to which you intend to link. Cheers! bd2412 T 13:45, 24 December 2013 (UTC)