User talk:Roaring Siren/2

.

If any administrator or user wants to contact me for Anything, please do below :

Re:Deletion review for File:Rumble_Roses_Mud_Wrestling.JPG
Sorry? There's no deletion review, but there is an IfD. And I realise that there is one, as I was the one who started it... J Milburn (talk) 11:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Terror Inside
A tag has been placed on Terror Inside requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you.  TN ‑  X   - Man  15:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kelly Overton (actress)
I have nominated Kelly Overton (actress), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Kelly Overton (actress). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you
The article you created, Kelly_Overton_(actress) maybe deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
 * Articles for deletion/Kelly_Overton_(actress).

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important. There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
 * 1) You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
 * 2) You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
 * 3) When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you. Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept. Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
 * 4) You can merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 01:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Kelly Overton (actress)
Were you arguing for keep or delete at the AfD...? In either case, the sources toward notability were easy to find to establish coverage of her as an actress AND a director. So I improved the article. Any advice?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:53, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of In My Sleep
A tag has been placed on In My Sleep requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. TheLetterM (talk) 15:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The sources and links are out there: director, producer, production company, Official Website, IMDB, Celebrity Winder, Soundtrack Collector. In post production and slated for release in a few months... its a keeper and just needs work.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

To hell with a speedy delete... (grin)
How about this my friend... from almost being deleted to being worth a DYK.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Al Farooj Fresh
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Al Farooj Fresh, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.gulfbase.com/site/interface/NewsArchiveDetails.aspx?n=53931. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The problem was that the article was mostly copied from a newspaper article; in addition, the statement was promotional in nature. Personally, I don't believe the restaurant is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article; but if you believe otherwise, you can re-create the article, preferrably as a userspace draft at User:Roaring Siren/Al Farooj Fresh. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:24, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Al Farooj Fresh
A tag has been placed on Al Farooj Fresh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pax85 (talk) 08:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Reiko RR.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Reiko RR.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Red Sonja 2009.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Red Sonja 2009.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mimi Lesseos
A tag has been placed on Mimi Lesseos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 14:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Nope. Already deleted. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:41, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pushed to the Limit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pushed to the Limit, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable movie (see WP:NOTABILITY).

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:32, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Terror Inside
A tag has been placed on Terror Inside requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pushed to the Limit
I have nominated Pushed to the Limit, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Pushed to the Limit. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Al Farooj Fresh
A tag has been placed on Al Farooj Fresh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:40, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

ANI thread
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:55, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. -- Syrthiss (talk) 17:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Third Opinions
Hi Roaring Siren,

I've have checked the page history to discover that you were the editor who requested a third opinion at both Al Farooj Fresh and Mimi Lesseos. It seems you posted these to the Active Disagreements section without fully reading the information above it. Third opinions are for content disputes between two editors and are not for articles nominated for deletion - as you have seen there is a whole separate process for this. So it's a bit of a pain to go to the talk pages and create a request wondering where the dispute is, only to find the page is now deleted! But nevermind, we're all here to learn...

You seem to be quite busy on WP and have certainly been here longer than me, but judging from your talk page and your contributions you're having a few problems with some of the policies and guidelines. It must get quite tiring and I admire you sticking with it to try and improve your editing. It might seem a bit like Delicious carbuncle (talk) is following you around and maybe persecuting you, but they are rightfully ensuring that wikipedia doesn't break the law and that articles meet policy and guidelines. You should take a note of what Dc wrote here and thoroughly read WP:VERIFIABILITY, WP:NOTABILITY, WP:COPYVIO and WP:Reliable Sources. If you've already read them, read them again ;-)

Going forward, can I suggest the best way for you to contribute is to find stub pages that are from subjects that interest you and expand them with sources that meet the requirements outlined above? Maybe Category:Stub-Class Professional wrestling articles would interest you?

I hope the above is of use and is of some encouragement. If you need some more help I can probably assist, fetch me on my talk page. Good luck! Bigger digger (talk) 20:19, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

FYI
Deletion of Bilateral relation pages despite ongoing merging effort Ed Fitzgerald t / c 08:33, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Al Farooj Fresh
I have nominated Al Farooj Fresh, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Al Farooj Fresh. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Al Farooj Fresh
I know the nominator will never agree, but do you approve of my work on the article? Any suggestions?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:18, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Operation Black Thunderstorm
Hello, I saw you did recently some edits to Operation Black Thunderstorm so I wanted to ask you something, could you please find some references and put them in the article to back up the Background section of the article please. Tx. Cheers!188.2.194.99 (talk) 15:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Imad Fayez Mughniyah
The image of this person has not been deleted, but it nearly was. This is because you chose "Fair use image of a living person" from the drop-down menu, even though he is dead. Please take more care choosing your selection in future :) Stifle (talk) 11:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

My Teacher's Wife
Thank you for your contribution to My Teacher's Wife. CollisionCourse (talk) 07:52, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Jean-Claude Forest.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Jean-Claude Forest.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Mimi deleted again
Sorry, the content you reposted contained the same exact copyright violation text. The article is protected as a redlink at the moment, and while I have no objection to it being recreated with quality content your repeated copyvio text isn't going to cut it. Syrthiss (talk) 16:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Example text from the version of the article I deleted:

"In Million Dollar Baby,Mimi fights to maintain her title against arch rival Billie-The Blue Bear portrayed by Lucia Rijker.She also has roles in the film Scorpion King and Gangs of New York.[1]"


 * the text from the previous version:

"In Million Dollar Baby,Mimi fights to maintain her title against arch rival Billie-The Blue Bear as portrayed by Lucia Rijker.She also has roles in the film Scorpion King and Gangs of New York.[1]"


 * the text from the linked website:

"In MILLION DOLLAR BABY, Mimi dons her boxing gloves and delivers a riveting performance as she fights to maintain her title against arch rival Billie-The Blue Bear as portrayed by Lucia Rijker. When Mimi is not wielding weapons and swords in THE SCORPION KING, or street fighting in GANGS OF NEW YORK (Daniel Day Lewis’ character axes Mimi in the forehead in the opening scene)"


 * In particular, the exact spacing on 'billie-the blue bear' and 'portrayed by Lucia Rijker' has me concerned. I can't do a direct diff between deleted versions of the article, but can cut and paste text out of it. There were similar infringements in basically every other paragraph. I'm happy to put the text into a sandbox for you to edit and address those concerns, if you'd like but I'm not comfortable with allowing the article to go forward in mainspace with the problems it had. Syrthiss (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Operation Black Thunderstorm
Black Thunderstorm has ended, the article should be updated accordingly. I put in the end date as June 15, when the Pak general said it ended. Also, I put in a reference for the number of 1,500 killed militants as well as two references for two soldiers killed since the number of 126 was stated. Something should be said about the aftermath of the operation.188.2.194.85 (talk) 16:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Jean-Claude Forest.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jean-Claude Forest.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 19:24, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Luigi Capello.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Luigi Capello.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 19:28, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

2009 Algerian military ambush
Thank you. That would appear to be a good candidate but you will have to nominate it at WP:ITN/C (or I can do so if you wish). There are several other examples listed under today's date already although none appear to be as suitable as this. -- can  dle &bull; wicke  21:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have nominated it. -- can  dle &bull; wicke  03:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

A talkpage stalker writes...
Hi! I watchlist Candlewicke's talk page, hence my post here.

I've taken a look at 2009 Thailand Standoff and had a couple of points:
 * I'd suggest moving the "Recent attacks" section so that it's before the "Standoff" section (and maybe rename it "Background"). I didn't want to be WP:BOLD here because you seem far more familiar with the episode than me (to be honest, I've only just heard of it - last time I was in Thailand was about two years ago, and tensions in the South were running high even then).
 * There was a reward mentioned in the "Recent attacks" section ("A a $5,900 reward for leads on the attack") - it wasn't clear to me if that was a typo or a reference to Aussie dollars. I'd suggest, if possible, having the reward stated in Baht (with a conversion to US dollars, perhaps).

No view on ITN - Candlewicke is the ITN guru, not me!

Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 10:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

There and back again
Oh dear, sorry I wasn't here that day. But I see you've nominated it so at least it has its chance. :D -- can  dle &bull; wicke  15:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)