User talk:Rob kenyon

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, La tati, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, La tati appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. La tati has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:La tati and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:La tati with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:La tati.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Whpq 18:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Wapping-gate.
I have nominated Wapping-gate., an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Wapping-gate.. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Gosox5555 (talk) 15:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wapping-gate.
A tag has been placed on Wapping-gate. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Gordonrox24 ''' &#124; Talk 17:52, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Orwell, Keats and Gringoire
Hi Rob - thanks for your contribution to Gringoire - I found it very interesting. Do you happen to know what period of Gringoire Orwell is likely to have been referring to.. that would help me place your contribution in the article. Also you called the paper "La Gringoire".. as far as I can see the name is simply "Gringoire" but if you have reason to believe otherwise I would be grateful to hear it. Zargulon (talk) 13:46, 18 January 2010 (UTC)