User talk:RobbieH19/sandbox

I recommend using these questions as a guide (from the WikiEd Peer Review Module): 1. What does the article (or section) do well? I really liked how you gave background information and broke it down into decades to really showcase how diversity progressed in America I noticed that the “Determinants of Diversity Training” section included a lot of studies; I really liked how you backed everything up with research, but still kept a neutral tone

2. What changes would you suggest overall? I think you might still be working on this, but I didn’t see too many references, so maybe just figure out places to put your references. Content-wise, I really enjoyed it!

3. What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? It might be helpful to include another corporate example of diversity training from a better-known firm and how their diversity training changed throughout the years (I also think that you can take a look into diversity programs in firms)

4. Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! I personally really liked your article’s structure: I felt like there was a natural flow; I’m still trying to figure out how my article's structure will be, but I would like mine to flow as well as yours :))