User talk:Robbieranger

October 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Total Nonstop Action Wrestling, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jtalledo (talk) 23:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive page moves. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GiantSnowman 07:59, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Huh? What for?

You moved St James' Park against consensus, despite the fact that said consensus is readily visible on the article's talkpage. You then proceeded to move Brazil national football team, New York Red Bulls and Liberty Professionals F.C. to new titles which were contrary to the Manual of style and had not been discussed. GiantSnowman notified you at that point that your conduct was disruptive, and warned you that he would take action if you continued. Your response was to accuse him of corruption before blanking the warnings from your talkpage and then moving yet another page to an inappropriate title. GiantSnowman then followed through on his warning and blocked you. Are you now clear on why you were blocked? Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 21:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Well I do understand that a couple of the moves were unconstructive, however I took the warnings on board and made no more edits after the warning and got blocked. That I don't understand and thats why I think GiantSnowman has just done it for the sake of doing.
 * You have moved an article (without consensus and against the naming conventions about two days and a half after you were warned. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

If it is the Total Nonstop Action wrestling article, yes I did move that but only to add the frequently used initials (TNA) as I was confident this would be a constructive move. However I got told that it was better with just Total Nonstop Action Wrestling and not Total Nonstop action wrestling (TNA). So I then left the article alone as I was happy with this and was seen as a goodwill edit. In future I will make sure to discuss any changes I feel are worth making with other users on the article talk page before making any edits to avoid something like this happening again as I would like Wikipedia to be a friendly environment for all users. Robbieranger (talk) 21:47, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BadSynergy (talk) 22:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Please refrain from moving the page until a source is provide although this is the likely new name for the stadium nothing has been annouced and there certainly no sources confirming plan to rename it to that only that there considering it  Andrewcrawford  ( talk  -  contrib ) 22:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the article Celtic F. C.. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  04:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Septic F.C


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Septic F.C, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  04:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu t/c 05:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * You've been warned for page move issues before, so page move-related vandalism is, quite frankly, stupid. -- Kinu  t/c 05:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Unblock appeal

 * i very much doubt you will be unbanned, you have done things bordering on vandalism before and have a clear biased, but what you done yesterday means your unlikely to get unbanned because it will be a big risk, the only way a admin would unblock you is if you where chaperoned and limited to what you can edit ie a topic ban on anything related to the old firm. If you do come back i hope you respect wikipedia for what it is and not a tool for you to have fun with :( Andrewcrawford ( talk  -  contrib ) 16:35, 3 February 2013 (UTC)