User talk:Robby zx

November 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Karan Nath has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:11, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Karan Nath was changed by Robby zx (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851196 on 2018-11-18T13:11:33+00:00

Welcome!
Hello, Robby zx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Karan Nath did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Geniac (talk) 13:35, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Karan Nath
Hello, I'm Woodroar. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Karan Nath, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Woodroar (talk) 17:07, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Referencing
Please do not add any unreferenced info, see WP:RS for info on what counts as a reliable source, and feel free to ask me any questions, but know that it is not vandalism when someone removes unsourced info, as unsourced material is against wikipedia policy. Tornado chaser (talk) 18:49, 25 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Calling it vandalism when someone is obviously not doing vandalism, for example they are removing unsourced info, is a personal attack, please stop this.
 * Also, if you know there is a source for the info you are adding, please add the source yourself, if you don't know how to do this, don't be afraid to ask. Tornado chaser (talk) 20:12, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Karan Nath. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:30, 25 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Not only is this edit a violation of WP:BLP because it is unsourced, but it is also a violation of the three-revert rule. I strongly suggest you self-revert and undo the change yourself so you do not get blocked for edit warring. —C.Fred (talk) 20:37, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Another editor has already reverted it. That said, do not add the alleged birthdate to the article again. You need to discuss the matter at the talk page and provide a reliable source first. —C.Fred (talk) 20:43, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 20:57, 25 November 2018 (UTC)