User talk:Robcuiper

Welcome!
Hello, Robcuiper, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as S.p.y., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drikulaeri talk  16:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of S.p.y.


The article S.p.y. has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Drikulaeri talk  16:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 14:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maduk (musician)
Hello Robcuiper,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Maduk (musician) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Celestinesucess (talk) 08:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Are We There Yet? (London Elektricity album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Are We There Yet? (London Elektricity album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Are We There Yet? (London Elektricity album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 14:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noisecontrollers (December 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheMagnificentist was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noisecontrollers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- TheMagnificentist (talk) 08:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Active Directory. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 13:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The edit in question was not vandalism. It was an enforcement of WP:NOTFORUM. You should self revert and apologize to Robcuiper. 207.225.212.235 (talk) 01:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Content deletion without justification is vandalism by definition, especially when it is abusing the minor edit flag too.
 * See you around, sockpuppet. —Codename Lisa (talk) 05:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * So, if I make this edit and make a summary like "removed forum-like posts who dont add to the discussion" it's okay?Robcuiper (talk) 10:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No, it isn't, because, first, WP:TPO does not sanction normal editors to do that; second, we actually have a Reference Desk to ask and answer the kind of questions that you deleted. So, as you can see, these communications are not entirely forbidden in Wikipedia.
 * However, providing the aforementioned edit summary is still orders of magnitude better! This is called having transparency. With an edit summary, you are demonstrating that you are doing something in good faith. Believe me, if you had provided one, we'd be having a much more pleasant conversation; or maybe had none at all. Also, an edit summary justifies your action. Wikipedia's fundamental pillars allow ordinary rules of policies and guidelines to be bent and even broken, if there is sufficient justification.
 * Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 13:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Just admit that you didn't even look at the change before hitting revert in an effort to own the topic and now you are trying to save face. 2600:100E:B11B:ADFF:3468:351C:FD33:58A (talk) 15:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Wow, RobCuiper! You've got staunch anonymous fans already! I envy you. (Well, not really. I actually know what's going on.) Please feel free to study WP:TPO and WP:MINOR to make an informed decision. I won't be bothering you on this anymore unless you have a question you want answered. —Codename Lisa (talk) 21:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FabricLive.30


The article FabricLive.30 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * fails WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Domdeparis (talk) 14:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Fabric live 30.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Fabric live 30.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 14:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of FabricLive.30 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FabricLive.30 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/FabricLive.30 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 10:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Apex (musician)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Apex (musician), Robcuiper!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for creating this article - it's appreciated. It's just been reviewed. Could you please look it over and see if you can help address the improvement tags? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:52, 19 February 2017 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Orphaned non-free image File:Fabric live 30.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fabric live 30.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Assist with Dnb and Dubstep Article
Good morning Rob - I'm currently having issues with a page I created for Katfyr. The page has now been marked for deletion. I believe the reason why it has been marked for deletion is that the users are not familiar with this niche article. For example, I see that you had the same issue posting about Noisecontrollers. As someone who understands this market I can surely help support your efforts as well. Please help support keep my article on Katfyr as I have addressed the notability issues raised. The deletion contest is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Katfyr#Katfyr Best regards pbigio (talk) 8:48, 6 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Honestly, I haven't heard of Katfyr before now, but this is already a better article then DJ_Heavygrinder! Speaking of which, is there a source that they are married?

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Global Gathering 2004


The article Global Gathering 2004 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "does not warrant a stand alone article; fails WP:NEVENT and WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 21:10, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Geuzestekerij De Cam moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Geuzestekerij De Cam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:55, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geuzestekerij De Cam (October 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Geuzestekerij De Cam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Geuzestekerij_De_Cam Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Geuzestekerij_De_Cam reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Onel 5969  TT me 00:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Multi-level cell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seagate. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Geuzestekerij De Cam
Hello, Robcuiper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Geuzestekerij De Cam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

D-Block & S-te-Fan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, D-Block & S-te-Fan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 10:29, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Geuzestekerij De Cam


Hello, Robcuiper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Geuzestekerij De Cam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:30, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:D-Block & S-te-Fan
Hello, Robcuiper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:D-Block & S-te-Fan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:22, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Robcuiper/sandbox
Hello, Robcuiper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Robcuiper/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)