User talk:Robearsn

Image copyright problem with Image:1915-1916_glee_club.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:1915-1916_glee_club.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Magnussamuelsson.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Magnussamuelsson.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:145_year_logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:145_year_logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 17:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Burl Ives
Hello. You added information to the Burl Ives article and cited a source. The URL for the source must be incorrect because the link does not work. Could you please fix it? Thank you! -- Chironomia (talk) 02:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Bedford, New York Assessment
I took a look at it. Sorry for the delay, but it looks like I'm the only assessor for WikiProject Cities these days.


 * I rated it Start-class in part to the fact that it has a very short History section and an additional Landmarks section on top of what I consider a "bare bones" article, which generally, for communities in New York, have only a bot-generated Demographics and Geography section plus a box on the side that gives short and easy statistics on the city. Even though this doesn't have such a box, the article is still very short.


 * Now, I rated it a Low-importance article because of the fact that no really significant thing has happened here, as far as I can tell from the article; apparently, it wasn't even significant enough to be mentioned either in the Battle of White Plains article, or in its sources.[1][2] There are no inline references in the history section, so there is no telling even how Bedford is related to the Battle of White Plains at all...it may be true, but it shouldn't be here if its not verified, so that is something that can be worked on. ;)

If you would like me to swing by again, I sure can. Just come and give me a holler.

Thansk and cheers, --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 13:34, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:1915-1916 glee club.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:1915-1916 glee club.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. GrapedApe (talk) 03:15, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Taskstream corporate logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Taskstream corporate logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Taskstream


A tag has been placed on Taskstream, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 2600:6C4E:580:46B:0:E653:2549:B879 (talk) 17:39, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Taskstream corporate logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Taskstream corporate logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Pgcshield copy1.jpg


The file File:Pgcshield copy1.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 12:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Pgcshieldbluebar.jpg


The file File:Pgcshieldbluebar.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 05:25, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of University of Pennsylvania Glee Club


The article University of Pennsylvania Glee Club has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "It does not appear to be the case that reliable sources on this page (or ones I could find) cover the club in-depth enough in a manner that is separate from the University of Pennsylvania for the club to be independently notable, especially in light of WP:RSSM. In the absence of reliable sources independent of both Penn and the club, the club's page should be deleted."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:37, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of University of Pennsylvania Glee Club for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of Pennsylvania Glee Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/University of Pennsylvania Glee Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)