User talk:Robert5564

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Nimbley6 (3rd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -- Schcambo aon scéal? 17:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Schcambo aon scéal? 17:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Schcambo aon scéal? 19:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Kilmarnock
You asked if I could provide edits to Kilmarnock. The answer, in short, is no. I have no knowledge of Kilmarnock and have never been there; all I can offer is to help protect its article from vandalism. However, since you seem interested in opening a direct dialogue, here is the courtesy of a direct reply.

Please take a good look at the message at the top of this page: you have been accused of sockpuppetry. This is a serious accusation and it would be in your best interest to read the case against you, and offer rebuttal if appropriate.

Assuming that the evidence is correct, your history of edits includes:
 * Simple vandalism, such as this and this
 * Hoaxes (e.g. a now-deleted page about a fictitious EP, by a British pop singer whose name I now forget, that you claimed to have co-produced)
 * Blatant self-promotion
 * Recurring copyright violations
 * Numerous user accounts that serve to evade legitimate blocks (see Suspected sock puppets/Nimbley6 (2nd) and Suspected sock puppets/Nimbley6 (3rd))

I want to think that your editing attempts are in earnest, that you really think you're working to improve Wikipedia, but unfortunately your edits are, by and large, not improvements. In fact, by your past actions (again, assuming that this is correct), you have made yourself persona non grata here. Nothing personal, but if you really want to help Wikipedia, you might want to consider taking a very long break from editing, period. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 19:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)