User talk:Robert94704

Help
I am working on a Bio of a living person and I have unintentionally made some wiki violations pointed out by Rees11. How do I resolve this with the wiki user?


 * Some of the changes you made were good. I don't think you should have re-added the "pages that reference" section. You certainly should not have put back in most of the external links. See wp:el for the external link policy. Article content should be discussed on Talk:Ralph_Osterhout. Rees11 (talk) 02:22, 17 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Since November the Ralph Osterhout article has had 10 credible references added and all of the "advertisement" like wording has been removed. In addition more biographical sections have been added. I am requesting that the maintenance templates be removed.(Robert94704 (talk) 18:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)).

Oops
I could not see the point of Template:Ralph Osterhout. The content is below. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 04:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Ralph Osterhout

1999 to Present = Osterhout Design Group (ODG), CEO/Founder

2003 to 2008 = Sierra Nevada Coporation, Sr. VP - Advanced Technology Group

2000 to 2003 = Inter-4, CEO/Founder

1990 to 1999 = Machina/Team Machina, CEO/Founder

1985 to 1990 = S-Tron, CEO/Founder

1976 to 1990 = Tekna, CEO/Founder

Website = Osterhout Design Group

Location = San Francisco, CA

Ralph Osterhout
Hi. You have again removed the maintenance templates from the Ralph Osterhout articles without addressing their issues: badly sourced, reads like an advertisement. Adding text in front of citations that is is not supported by the citation does exactly the opposite. If you do not agree with the templates, please discuss on the talk page of the article why you think they are not adequate. Please take a look at WP:BLP and WP:NPOV to better understand why the templates have been added. Thank you. Rror (talk) 09:58, 17 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello Rror. Since November the Ralph Osterhout article has had 11 credible references added and all of the "advertisement" like wording has been removed. In addition more biographical sections have been added. I am requesting that the WP:BLP and WP:NPOV templates be removed.(Robert94704 (talk) 23:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)).

Speedy deletion nomination of Rock Paper Reality
Hello Robert94704,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rock Paper Reality for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheLongTone (talk) 13:03, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RockPaperReality.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RockPaperReality.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 16 July 2019 (UTC)