User talk:RobertBLeck1

Welcome!
Hello, RobertBLeck1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Robert Leckington, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Jakob (talk)  17:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Leckington


A tag has been placed on Robert Leckington requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Jakob (talk)  17:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello Jakec. I see that there's a previous version that has been created by me. I would like to use this latest version created by JonRusselCring. He and I have been working on getting it Wiki-approved, but seem to be always hitting walls. I'm thinking that if we can at least clear up any previous versions of the submission that'll at least put us on the right track. I don't see how to remove them on my side. --Robert RobertBLeck1 (talk) 21:54, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jonrussellcring/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Jonrussellcring/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Star_Mississippi&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Jonrussellcring/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star  Mississippi  03:25, 15 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello StarMississippi. I've asked Jakec if he could help me, in the event that he can't I'd like to resubmit what I sent to him to you here.
 * "I see that there's a previous version that has been created by me. I would like to use this latest version created by JonRusselCring. He and I have been working on getting it Wiki-approved, but seem to be always hitting walls. I'm thinking that if we can at least clear up any previous versions of the submission that'll at least put us on the right track. I don't see how to remove them on my side." --Robert RobertBLeck1 (talk) 21:57, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * okay any duplicates I would like to have be removed. I would like to continue to try and get this current one approved. Thanks. --Robert RobertBLeck1 (talk) 21:58, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Great. You're all set to edit User:Jonrussellcring/sandbox. When you feel it's finished, you can submit it for review. Star   Mississippi  01:56, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Star. Does this mean the previous pages created have been removed for submission then? We can submit this current version after it has been cleaned up and had it's "promotional" tendency removed? RobertBLeck1 (talk)Robert RobertBLeck1 (talk) 02:50, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes. Draft:Robert Leckington, which was blank, has been deleted at your request. If User:Jonrussellcring/sandbox is approved once you re-submit it, it can be moved to the proper title. Star   Mississippi  03:07, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you ver much Star! :) RobertBLeck1 (talk)Robert RobertBLeck1 (talk) 04:21, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, RobertBLeck1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:47, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question
Hello, RobertBLeck1! I'm Bonadea. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. bonadea contributions talk 14:51, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

There is no deadline in Wikipedia
We are a global project to compile information covering the history of the universe, not Daily Variety. Once a draft article is cleaned up enough to submit, it may take weeks to approve; and that's fine with us. There is no deadline in Wikipedia. I realize things work differently in The Industry, but we don't give a damn.

And by the way, anybody who says they can get an article into Wikipedia fast and maintain it for you is a scammer, a liar and probably in violation of our Terms and Conditions. We smash those suckers flat when we catch them, but many of them never go any farther than taking your money and running. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  16:07, 23 November 2022 (UTC) married to a former Writers Guild-West member