User talk:RobertJudeson



Hello, RobertJudeson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode


 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 06:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Konkani language, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 06:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)


 * It is languages spoken or written, not just the official language. Adakiko (talk) 06:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saraswat Brahmin. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 08:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Karhade Brahmin. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ekdalian (talk) 07:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hi RobertJudeson! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Karhade Brahmin that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. You added an entire section marking the edit as minor! Ekdalian (talk) 14:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Ekdalian.
 * It seems to be selected unknowingly,anyhow the whole section is perfectly cited page by page.Thanks for this information related to minor edit.I’ll take care of this in future. RobertJudeson (talk) 15:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste and related articles
Ekdalian (talk) 08:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Raj era sources
Hi. Just a heads up that Raj era sources are not considered reliable on Wikipedia, particularly when they relate to caste matters (see WP:RAJ). I see you've added one at Saraswat Brahmin. You should remove it and not add these sources to other articles. --RegentsPark (comment) 18:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Please use article talkpages
RobertJudeson, I noticed that you have recently been involved in edit-warring at several articles including Karhade Brahmin and Saraswat Brahmin, and that you are communicating almost exclusively through edit-summaries. In fact, you have yet to edit any article talkpage. Please see WP:BRD for the suggested approach to reach consensus instead of continuing along the current path that will likely lead to sanctions. Let me know if you have any questions about the process. Questions about sources or content though should be taken up with fellow editors at the concerned article talk page, or at a relevant noticeboard such as WP:RSN. Abecedare (talk) 18:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Abecedare.
 * I am unable to understand why my edits are reverted inspite of good sources.They can use talk page,I will be happy to clarify my edits.when I initiated talk with Ekdalian,he deleted my talk and didn’t wish to continue but reverted multiple times.Not getting what’s happening. RobertJudeson (talk) 06:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * RobertJudeson, instead of user talkpage, try using the article talkpage (say, Talk:Karhade Brahmin) and lay out what changes you are proposing to the corresponding article, along with the sources and, ideally, relevant quotes from those sources. That way all editors interested in the article can participate in the discussion. Abecedare (talk) 06:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Abecedare.
 * Thank you for this link but they are experienced editors if they had issue they would have initiated talk.They didn’t,I initiated two times with Ekdalian he reverted my talk as like I am nothing.secondly initiated sockpuppetry against me for opposing revert,see his edits.With good faith I may neglect this but this is not good move.@Abecedareyou are admin you have full rights.Please see my edits in karhade and Mohyal,I have given JSTOR,Specially meant for caste/social but they reverted!.Please ask them not to interfere in well cited articles.If they don’t want, they can feel free to talk,I will be ready.See my contributions from the day I joined,My intension is not to hurt any caste/person instead intercaste dispute was a part of Indian society. RobertJudeson (talk) 07:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Per WP:BRD, the onus is on you, not the other party/parties reverting you, to open the discussion on the article talk page. Calling in admins for help at this stage is like bring guns to a knife fight. – robertsky (talk) 09:31, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @Robertsky.
 * You are right Abecedare sent a link about talk which I understood but only one thing I felt odd is member with 8 edit(18 day account) has lodge Sock puppet investigation ,I have spent 2 months still unaware how to lodge Sock puppetry investigation.Ekdalian has commented against me in that.I expect all should collaborate towards contributing Wikipedia.That’s what my concern is. RobertJudeson (talk) 10:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Abecedare@RobertskyThank you. RobertJudeson (talk) 11:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Blocked

 * Hi @NinjaRobotPirate.
 * This is the only account I have.Kindly recheck your investigation.Moreover have you seen the evidence provided by the opponents?.RobertJudeson (talk) 15:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Make an unblock request if you want to be unblocked. It should be easy for any other CheckUser to verify that the block is correct.  To save you some time, I'll point out that I've already investigated the case as thoroughly as I'm going to, and you won't change my mind by proclaiming your innocence.  I'm also not going to believe "it was my brother/roommate/friend". NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @NinjaRobotPirateNo I am not making you to believe anything but clearly I am affirming I and myself along is using this device and this is my one and only account!.Kindly recheck once. RobertJudeson (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I just told you to make an unblock request instead of pinging me. Since you're ignoring what I say, I've muted you and will no longer receive your pings. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @NinjaRobotPirate.
 * Ok man not a problem.Have a nice day. RobertJudeson (talk) 15:59, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Request for Re-evaluation of Sockpuppetry Accusation and CU Investigation
Hi User:Jpgordon. In that case can you tell me the name of the account which you feel I am sock as per your CU? RobertJudeson (talk) 03:42, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 * RobertJudeson, you are already familiar with the SPI case as indicated in your unblock request. That includes information on the sockmaster as well as previously found sockpuppets. Liz Read! Talk! 08:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)