User talk:RobertMfromLI/Archives/2010/August

Rosamunde Pilcher/Flowers in the Rain
Hi, The problem I have with your addition is that "Flowers in the Rain & Other Stories" is already listed under "Collections", as it is a collection of short stories previously published in various women's magazines (I don't know why the title as listed there has the author's name appended or the second colon; it should be as I wrote it above).

My impression was that the "As Rosamunde Pilcher" category was just for novels.

OceanVortex (talk) 04:02, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi,


 * I don't think there was ever a stand-alone book called "Flowers in the Rain" published in 1991, because 1) the story "Flowers in the Rain" is only 19 pages long; 2) the anthology was published in 1991. I believe the Amazon listing you reference is really just the anthology.
 * OceanVortex (talk) 04:18, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Juice (mag)
Hi Robert,

I asked a previous person at wikipedia what I should do to help the article and he told me to add references which I have done and erase words that would cause spam from the last one. Is there anything else I can do to get this page up and running soon? Thank you!

VeniceBeachLove (talk) 04:07, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Juice (mag)
Hi Robert,

Thank you for the feedback. I am an unpaid intern for the company and feel that it is important for the Magazine to get it's voice out there in the world. Should I put this same information in my userspace section first before saving it again? Also, how do I get to my userspace section? Thank you for your time Robert.

VeniceBeachLove (talk) 04:21, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Hospital One
Hello RobertMfromLI. I am just letting you know that I deleted Hospital One, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Kimchi.sg (talk) 05:09, 12 August 2010 (UTC)


 * You tagged it the second time as CSD G4, which should only be used for tagging a page that is substantially similar to one deleted through a previous deletion discussion. Reposts of prod or CSD-deleted content do not qualify under CSD G4, though they probably will qualify under the original criteria, speaking from experience. Kimchi.sg (talk) 05:24, 12 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, the and  templates do not mark the article for speedy deletion. They are there only to point out issues in the article content. Kimchi.sg (talk) 05:27, 12 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, those were just to clarify the other reasoning to whomever reviewed it for deletion based on the original request.


 * Thanks, RobertMfromLI | User Talk 05:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC)


 * If I were you, I wouldn't have changed tags just to end up with the correct rationale. Either way an admin still reviews the article and checks if it really fits CSD criteria. But this is just me - other admins may decline based on a quick comparison of the article and the CSD template; in that case, do the politically correct thing and change it to the right CSD tag. Kimchi.sg (talk) 10:00, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 13:12, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

.

A discussion to revisit for easy and quick consensus
Uncle G (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I have added my input on the article's talk page. RobertMfromLI | User Talk 22:28, 12 August 2010 (UTC)