User talk:Robert B Colton

Hello, if you would like to leave me a message feel free to use the new section at the top right of this form. Be sure to sign your post with four tides so that I may find your talk page. Unless you specifically state that I should reply here, I will most likely reply on your talk page.

= User Page Redirection =
 * I see that you have redirected you user page to the article General Joseph Colton. Redirecting a user page to an article is unusual, to say the least. Are you willing to explain why you have done this? JamesBWatson (talk) 08:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes I would gladly elaborate. My user page appears in Google when one searches my name, I do not like this. I feel it is ok, because if an admin or another editor needs to contact me, they are already know how to get past this to my talk page. You do not have a problem with this do you? Robert B Colton (talk) 09:21, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

= Re-Blocked Unblock Request = You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. I was never convinced by your WP:BROTHER defence, but decided to give you the benefit of what little doubt there was, so I let you have another chance. If you would like to know why, you may like to read WP:ROPE. When I unblocked you, I said "any sign of unconstructive editing is likely to lead to a block which will be allowed to stick". And yes, I really did mean "any sign". So, what do you proceed to do? Redirect your user page to an article, which in itself looked strange, but even more striking was the fact that "you" had never edited that article, while "your brother" had done so via several sockpuppet accounts. And then, after that strange user page edit, what is your very first article edit after being unblocked? Repeating a reverted edit that had been done by your "brother", again on an article that "you" had never edited. There is no longer any doubt to give you the benefit of: you took your rope, and hanged yourself with it. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text to the talk page of your original account, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:16, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * This looks like a sockpuppet account to me, but if it isn't then it's a meatpuppet, and we treat them exactly the same. This account has been used to support editing by a user who has abused several accounts and been blocked, and to repeat that user's reverted editing. Whether this account is run by that person, or by his brother acting on his behalf, makes no difference. Since I blocked you, I will leave it up to another administrator to assess your latest unblock request. However, if someone else had blocked you and I were assessing your request, I would revoke your talk page access. You have wasted enough of our time. Incidentally, your claim that the change to John F. Kennedy had been "agreed upon" is absurd. The only support on the talk page was from your "brother" and an IP editor using two IPs in the same range as some that have been identified as being used by your "brother", and with no other edits except to File:GeneralColton.png. One person expressing the same opinion with an account and two IP addresses does not constitute agreement, especially since another person has taken part in the discussion and explicitly disagreed with your "brother". JamesBWatson (talk) 12:21, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I would like to ask that that reviewing administrator please thoroughly investigate my editing history as you will see my claims are valid. As you can see |here and on the Robert F. Kennedy user talk page that Kennedy articles rotate images to maintain freshness of the page. I also suspect foul play by blocking admins as they find all of this somehow amusing |see here.