User talk:Robert Blandford

Speedy deletion of A'PEXi PowerFC
A tag has been placed on A'PEXi PowerFC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Jamie  S93  13:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of A'PEXi PowerFC
I have nominated A'PEXi PowerFC, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/A'PEXi PowerFC. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. — Travis talk  15:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm I think it is reference material Robert Blandford (talk) 16:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Hangon tags
Hi. I've removed your hangon tag from this article. It is not nominated for speedy deletion anymore, so hangon tags no longer apply. The question of whether or not the article will be deleted will be settled by the conversation at Articles for deletion/A'PEXi PowerFC. Typically, this procedure takes five days, during which you are welcome to improve the article and address the concerns. I would like to note that while you are spending a lot of time on the article, I am concerned that you are not addressing some of the problems that are likely to lead to this article being deleted. There are some policies and guidelines that might be helpful to you in that regard. These include Notability, the subguideline for products at Notability (organizations and companies) and Verifiability. Beyond the question of article content, the article is unlikely to survive unless you can demonstrate that this product meets the notability guidelines through referencing reliable secondary sources. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)