User talk:Robert Gerbicz~enwiki

I undid your change to the article Wilson prime. Feel free to discuss this with me if you like or if you think I undid your edit in error. Thanks. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 08:38, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * First here you have written: "When removing content, please specify a reason", I know that this is only template. But this would be good for your edit. I have added more terms (and sorted the terms, but removed none of them), what you have removed. The only removal from me was the silly formula that (p-1)!==+-1+Bp mod p^2, replaced by (p-1)!==-1+Bp mod p^2. Since (p-1)!==1+Bp mod p^2 is impossible for p>2: because it would imply that -1==(p-1)!==1 mod p is also true, so p|2, contradiction. (that was the reason that you saw only -1 in the second column.) Robert Gerbicz (talk) 08:48, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

" 08:45, 2 September 2011 Toshio Yamaguchi (talk | contribs) (9,757 bytes) (Undid revision 447891075 by Robert Gerbicz (talk) do you have a source for these values?)"
 * You can verify each one with (p-1) multiplications and divisions. Robert Gerbicz (talk) 08:56, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I am sorry, my first edit summary was nonsense, I know that. And yes, I agree with the change to the formula. I added that formula a while ago and I think I simply copied it from another article if I remember correctly and didn't check whether it actually fits into this article or not. (Btw, I am aware that the last couple of terms I added and attributed to Mark Rodenkirch are unpublished and I am open to discuss a removal of these terms. The Ribenboim book mentions this search, but does not give the values of the near Wilson primes). Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 09:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I took the liberty to correct the Generalizations -subsection. I did not yet return the results by Gerbicz to the table, but otherwise I corrected the errors found by Gerbicz. Depending on the choice of the reference used for the generalization the search limit should also be changed to be the same for the Wilson primes.Rajula (talk) 13:23, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to comment
Hi, I would appreciate if you could share your view at Talk:Wilson prime. Thanks. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 09:40, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Robert Gerbicz. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Robert Gerbicz~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)