User talk:Robert Josepha

Proposed deletion of Oren Wilkes


The article Oren Wilkes has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:21, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oren Wilkes


The article Oren Wilkes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Has some worthwhile credits, but instead of significant coverage the most the list of sources offers is a "here's a hot new guy" blip on Essence.com. Gnews turns up nothing.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Mbinebri  talk &larr; 21:21, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Oren wilkes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oren wilkes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Oren wilkes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Fly by Night  ( talk )  00:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Oren Wilkes, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

someone deleted the talk page for the issues and i have been going back and forth for months about this article...what needs to be fixed now? I can do it now so there aren't anymore issues On the page there was a consensus to keep the page and that infact the references were valid and notable...half the references on here have wiki pages