User talk:Robert vram

Welcome!

Hello, Robert vram, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Mapping, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 15:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Mapping


A tag has been placed on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Mapping, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 15:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article, for two reasons: first it is clearly written in a manner that promotes the program, and would need complete rewriting in order to be encyclopedic, and second, it is quite obviously copied from another web site or publication. (By promotional, we mean not just commercial advertising, but any form of writing intending to advocate or promote any group, cause, program, or whatever. )

On the talk p., you said:


 * This article should not be deleted as it is related to a Process at WHO (World Helath organization). We are tying to get member states and communities to know VRAM (which I can not redirect here becasue VRMA is linked to another page) in order they get information on how tehy can protect themselves in front of risk and how to protect vulnerable populations from Earthquakes etc... We are a not a private company, we don´t make money of our job, we want in help need people to get us known how they can get help on prevention, wat is it vulnerability what is it risk assessment,.... we are not looking for propaganda or a website like approach, we want to be on the spot same as (for example) GAUL or SALB as it is important for the future of the information (notorious)flow, and for the Preparedness for in need countries to understand the meaning of WHO. it's also important to get the general public know what WHO is doing in terms of preparedness. We think that vulnerability Risk analysis and mapping are concepts that are linked together in this process/project/department We are planning on upload all the rest of the concepts as soon as VRAM is approved. We will also need to refer VRAM not to Video RAM but to a VRAM generic page where then we can redirect to VRAM (video RAM) and also To VRAM but we don't know how to do that Other connects to develo. vulnerable population Risk Assessment Vulnerability Disaster Crisis Hazard ... VRAM is planning to get a common glossary in terms of Risk Health issues using the aproach of wikipedia to be accessible to the rest of the community.


 * Please let us be there.

Let me explain how to proceed. There are two directions--you can write an article about the method of analysis, or you can write an article about your organization. For the first, the article would need to first show that it is a distinct method, and referred to elsewhere by other people, with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. If it is merely a program developed by your organization that you hope will be widely adopted, it is   not yet appropriate for an article here--an article in such circumstances is considered promotional.

If you mean to write an article about the organization, including some discussion of its program, again you need references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources. Not every group sponsored by the WHO is automatically notable.

In any case, you also need to write like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization, don't give the background of why the overall world problem is important. . Remember not to copy from a web site -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. That the present material is copied from elsewhere is indicated by  the format with short lines, which is not our style, as well as the wording. If perhaps you did write it specifically for us, it still needs to be written in a more neural tone. Keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of  press releases or  web sites, which are usually more expansive.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of the organization wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.

Additionally, you must choose another user name; we have a rule that only individuals can edit, and that the user name cannot indicate the name of an organization, in order to avoid the appearance that they control the page. On the new user page, declare your affiliation.  DGG ( talk ) 21:46, 17 March 2011 (UTC)