User talk:Roberta F.

Please mind WP:3RR on article Neo-nazism.You have broken the rule already. Thanks. Respos 04:49, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

3RR
Hi Roberta, you've been reported for a 3RR violation at Neo-Nazism and have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. When you return, please discuss your differences on the talk page. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 08:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Need help in discussing a list
Greetings; if you would visit the call for discussion at this page, I'd be grateful for your input. Thanks! Talk:List_of_German-language_philosophers Best, Universitytruth 13:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi I note you corrected my entry for KOSIR - if you are interested in the Billhook (english) please contact me.. Thanks, Bob (UK) aka BillhooksUK

Purodha on hr:wiki
Hi, Purodha. I'm Roberta F., bureaucrat from Croatian wikipedia. If you want me to grant bot status to your bot, please make a request on this page. :-)) --Roberta F. (talk) 14:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * My request is at hr:Wikipedija:Botovi. Thank you for your hint and for your assistance. --Purodha Blissenbach (talk) 15:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Bot status on hr:wiki granted. :-)) --Roberta F. (talk) 17:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you again for setting the bot flag so quickly :-))) --Purodha Blissenbach (talk) 17:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Motovun image
Hi, I've seen you've included a picture taken from flickr in the Motovun Film Festival article. Pictures in infoboxes usually have captions to explain what is shown in the picture, please include some description. Thanks :-) Timbouctou (talk) 23:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

South Slavic languages
Calling a good editor a "vandal" for cleaning up a dreadful article suggests you are not editing in good faith. Please take any points you have to the talk page, but don't revert to a barely legible version of the article. kwami (talk) 11:42, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * The edit wasn't unsourced either - I added the reference to a standard academic textbook on the Slavic languages. Your edit also wiped out an interwiki link, and reintroduced numerous spelling and grammatical errors.  It's an easy mistake to make, but please take more care in reviewing edits, and avoid wholesale block reverts where possible.  Best, Knepflerle (talk) 12:02, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * For me there is no good editor per se, but only good and verifiable sources, do not call on good editors, but on arguments and sources. Your edits regarding South Slavic languages are actually original research. --Roberta F. (talk) 11:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * "original research"? Please see directly above: "The edit wasn't unsourced either - I added the reference to a standard academic textbook on the Slavic languages".   Here's the edit, sourced to Roland Sussex, The Slavic Languages, Cambridge University Press (2006). Knepflerle (talk) 18:48, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Here's scientific opinion against. Miro Kačić, first director of the Institute of Croatian Language and Linguistics. He opposed the grouping of Croatian, Bosnian, Montenegrin and Serbian into a diasystem, because in his opinion the application of the term "diasystem" to a language is very questionable. He gave the following argument: "The question is, how to determine the language as a "diasystem"? It would be easy to put all Slavic languages into the category of a diasystem (it is only a matter of criterium), so it could easily be said: Slavic language as diasystem etc". Source: Hrvatski jezik Miro Kačić: Zašto hrvatski ne može nikako biti hrvatskosrpski (excerpt from the book Jezikoslovna promišljanja, Pergamena, Zagreb, 2001., ISBN 953-6576-12-2. This might help. Kubura (talk) 02:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Prozivanje
Da si procitala znala bi: iako se u drugim stvarima sa tobom ne slazem, slazem se da se u njegovom slucaju radi o originalnom istrazivanju kao sto si ti iznad navela. Imas mozda jos pitanja? --WizardOfOz (talk) 19:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Dobar je :) --WizardOfOz (talk) 15:56, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Na hr:wiki ne znam da se dogodilo trajno blokiranje prijavljenog suradnika bez ijednog upozorenja, jesi sigurna? :) --WizardOfOz (talk) 18:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Možda sam pogriješila, ali navela sam konkretan slučaj i ako imaš za usporedbu ovakvu blokadu s još uvijek praznom stranicom za razgovor bez ijedne riječi upućene prijavljenome suradniku s prihvatljivim suradničkim imenom, bez prethodne povijesti neprihvatljivog suradničkog ponašanja (vandalizam, uznemiravanje, zloporaba više suradničkih računa...) i skretanja pozornosti u čemu griješi s ovakvim - 16:40, 23 April 2010 Opiaterein (Talk | contribs) blocked Sokac121 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled - logom blokiranja, slobodno iznesi primjedbu na stranici namijenjenoj za iznošenje primjedbi. Lijep pozdrav :-)) --Roberta F. (talk) 23:22, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ne mogu je iznijeti jer sam jos uvijek trajno blokiran... bez upozorenja... a nemam se namjeru preko proxija uplicati u takve rasprave kakve se na toj stranici vode, jer me ne interesuju. :) --WizardOfOz (talk) 14:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Croatian
Please do not place personal attacks, such as calling other editors psychotic, in article talk pages. Legitimate points can be made without attacking people. — kwami (talk) 14:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * How am I attacking you? I'm asking you not to place attacks of other editors on talk pages.
 * Removing personal attacks is not vandalism. Please stop restoring them. If the author wants to make those points legitimately, he can. — kwami (talk) 15:39, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Kwamikagami: "Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Vandalism cannot and will not be tolerated. Common types of vandalism are the addition of obscenities or crude humor, page blanking, and the insertion of nonsense into articles."... "Committing vandalism violates Wikipedia policy. If you find that another user has vandalized Wikipedia you should revert these changes; you may also warn the user (see below for specific instructions). Users who vandalize Wikipedia repeatedly, despite warnings to stop, should be reported to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, and administrators may block them." Sorry, but this is a vandalism. And please, do not attack me (No personal attacks). Have a Nice Day --Roberta F. (talk) 15:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)''

'':Um, perhaps you didn't review what you were doing? You're accusing me of attacking you because I asked you not to place personal attacks on talk pages? — kwami (talk) 15:38, 23 July 2010 (UTC)''


 * Kwamikagami, what are you talking about? Where do you see that I wrote something about "psychotic"? --Roberta F. (talk) 14:13, 25 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I reverted edits which contained personal attacks, from an editor with a history of such edits; you restored them and accused me of vandalism. I didn't mean that you wrote it, but you did put it back on the page. — kwami (talk) 15:26, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Balkans sanctions warning
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to the Balkans if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Requests for arbitration/Macedonia.

I am giving you and everybody else involved in the Croatian disputes notice that I intend to crack down on the incivility that fills the current disputes. Any comment that attributes bad motives to an editor or otherwise insults an editor is going to draw a block. This will happen even if the incivility is in response to incivility from another editor. The appropriate response to that is to complain, not to respond in kind. I intend to apply this to everybody involved. According to the WP:ARBMAC sanctions, editors can only be blocked if they have been notified of the sanctions. You can find a list of the editors who have been notified at WP:ARBMAC. If I have missed anybody, please bring it to my intention. I am very serious about this. Looie496 (talk) 03:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Nove fotografije
Roberta F, molim vas da mi objasnite u cemu je problem sa fotografijom na Zoran Milanovic clanku da je toliko zelite ukloniti. Znam da se nas dvoje nismo slagali na Commons, i zaista se nadam da osobni razlozi ne stoje iza ovoga. Uvjeravam vas da ni iz daleka nemate temelj za optuzbe harassment-a. S postovanjem -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 11:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

INA building photos
Thanks! I really believe that the Croatian independence referendum, 1991 article benefited from that one! Btw, the article passed DYK review and is scheduled to make its appearance on the main page on 15 January.--Tomobe03 (talk) 17:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Interwiki order
Hi Roberta, thanks for adding interwiki links. However, please try to add them in the correct place. It's a little confusing, but the English Wikipedia orders interwiki links by the name of the language in its native tongue. So Croatian (Hrvatski) should go between Hindi (Hindi) and Italian (Italiano), before Indonesian (Bahasa Indonesia ... the "Bahasa" part doesn't count in this case because it means "language" in Indonesian). See [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dentistry&diff=516266592&oldid=516171753 my edit to fix your link addition at Dentistry], where I discovered this minor issue, for an example. Graham 87 05:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Mail
Nažalost, budući da u ovom svojstvu ne koristim mail niti druge slične kanale, za komunikaciju mi je na raspolaganju samo stranica za razgovor... GregorB (talk) 09:07, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Ovako bih rekao o pojedinačnim slučajevima:
 * Panorama Rijeke - i meni je sumnjivo, ali osobno bih bio malo oprezniji pri sumnjičenju suradnika.
 * Morčić - svaka umjetnina koja nije u javnoj domeni i ne potpada pod FoP je legitimno upitna kao motiv. Srećom, po diskusiji bih rekao da je problem riješen.
 * Zastave - vrlo slično kao morčić. Rekao bih da ne potpada pod FoP ("autorska djela koja su trajno smještena", itd.), čak ni uzevši u obzir da zakon nije sasvim dorečen: strogo gledajući, ništa nije trajno tj. ne traje vječno, pa ovdje treba ocijeniti namjeru da se djelo trajno izloži. I moguće rješenje je slično kao za morčić: dokazati da je motiv u javnoj domeni. Ovo neće biti lako, budući da je, kao što znaš, credit odnosno attribution kod nas za vizualne radove u medijima zamalo pa nepoznanica (u tiskanim izdanjima posebno, osim pod novijim, strogim komercijalnim ugovorima - mislim da nitko nikad nije "zaboravio" potpisati npr. Cropix) i da se pitanja autorskih prava obično dočekuju s čuđenjem.


 * Nisam siguran da članak 89 generalno pomaže. On naprosto preciznije definira situacije koje se imaju tretirati kao fair use. Činjenica da se djelo smije iskoristiti ne znači da se njegov copyright status time mijenja: to bi npr. značilo da su riječke zastave legitiman fair use, ali još uvijek potpadaju pod "reprodukciju" u smislu našeg ZoAP, što znači da na takvu vlastitu fotografiju čovjek ne može staviti CC-BY-SA ili sličnu licencu. Ovo je siva zona: recimo, rekao bih da je ova fotografija u redu, ali već ovu bi netko mogao osporiti (slika Ede Murtića, pod copyrightom, prikazana gotovo u cjelini).


 * Ne mogu reći da Elleasar griješi u kriterijima: primjenjuje ih pedantno, što pridonosi atmosferi koja se možda nabolje može opisati kao kafkijanska, uz odgovarajuće frustracije. I sam sam bio frustriran dosta puta: cijenim vlastite živce pa zato nastojim biti maksimalno oprezan pri uploadu i posebno pri unosu metapodataka da se ne bih dovodio u takav položaj. Pritom Elleasar sigurno ne nastupa iz nekakvih loših namjera - upravo suprotno, moj dojam je da izvrsno vlada problematikom i nastoji maksimalno razumjeti zakonske i druge okvire, što nije uvijek na štetu fotografija na Commonsu (v. npr. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Croatia/Archive_3 i posebno zaključak).


 * Cijenim tvoj rad - jednom sam rekao da si ti sa svojim fotografijama praktički među najproduktivnijim članovima WP Croatia ovdje na en wiki, iako formalno ne sudjeluješ - i zato mi je krivo zbog ovakvih situacija... GregorB (talk) 20:16, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Uh, ova dva primjera koje daješ su za trenutno brisanje. A daleko od toga da su jedini. Neki put ih ljudi stavljaju iz neshvaćanja copyrighta, ali često ga krše sasvim svjesno...
 * Postoji razlika između totala, i fotografije koja je ograničena na neki motiv. Kad ne bi bilo razlike, ne bi bilo uopće moguće imati na fotografiji većinu događaja i motiva, što nije ideja zakona. Npr. u Sloveniji ne postoji FoP, a ipak bih mogao iz aviona s 1000 m snimiti panoramu Ljubljane na kojoj se kao detalj vidi zgrada XY, dok bi fotografija iste zgrade u krupnom planu snimljena s ulice došla pod udar zakona. Na izložbi slika bi isto tako bilo nemoguće snimiti smislenu fotografiju, jer bi se na svakoj vidio barem dio neke slike. Međutim, slike na fotografiji su vjerojatno u redu kao dio šire scene ("Predsjednik Mesić razgleda izložbu slika Ede Murtića"), a nisu ako su jedini motiv. Dakle, totali su prihvatljivi, a fotografije usmjerene na zaštićeni (u slučaju Commonsa: potencijalno zaštićeni) motiv nisu. Budući da je teško povući granicu između ta dva slučaja, ovo je nužno siva zona.
 * Nisam odvjetnik, tako da ne mogu tvrditi da je ovo ispravna interpretacija, ali vjerujem da bi na Commonsu, kad bi postavila pitanje, dobila slične odgovore. Dapače, ono što kod Commonsa ne volim je određena prisila da se postane odvjetnik da bi se razumjela pravila, a najviše mrzim što čak ni to nije dovoljno. No, što je - tu je: kao i kod Wikipedije, prijeđimo preko mana i iskoristimo vrline... GregorB (talk) 11:39, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anđelo Jurkas


The article Anđelo Jurkas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Bihco (talk) 14:18, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Anđelo Jurkas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Overflow, PR, Ramirez, TBF and Lollobrigida

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikilinking
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
 * dates
 * years
 * commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
 * common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony  (talk)  02:22, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to Infobox film or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
 * This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

The Pulse (WP:MED newsletter) June 2014
The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.

The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the User WPMed template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.

BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors
Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Medical Translation Newsletter
 Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce

Medical Translation Newsletter

Issue 1, June/July 2014 by CFCF, Doc James

sign up for monthly delivery



This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Wikipedia available to the world, in the language of your choice. note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject Medicine

Spotlight - Simplified article translation

Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.

Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:
 * WHO's list of Essential Medicines
 * Neglected tropical diseases
 * Key diseases for medical subspecialties like: oncology, emergency medicine (list), anatomy, internal medicine, surgery, etc.

We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.

What's happening?

I've () taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.
 * IEG grant

For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.
 * Wikimania 2014

There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Wikipedia presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish. What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.
 * Integration progress


 * Swedish Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and free encyclopedia of medical content. We want Wikipedia to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that. Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May.
 * Dutch Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Wikipedia is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie.
 * Polish Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Wikipedia has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Wikipedia does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article. (This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration
 * Arabic The Arabic Wikipedia community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Wikipedia facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.

Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.
 * Integration guides

Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here

News in short


 * To come
 * Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
 * Proofreading drives


 * Further reading
 * Translators Without Borders
 * Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!