User talk:Robertcoogan

January 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Changeling (Marvel Comics) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prodego talk  19:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Marvel's Changeling
Please take your suggestions up on the talk page for Marvel's Changeling. At this point you are being disruptive and are vandalising the article.

- J Greb (talk) 19:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * No, I was in the middle of making edits, not vandalizing the article, when all of my edits were undone. All of my edits were in keeping with Wikipedia guidelines.  Please refer to the discussion on the article's page before labeling someone as a vandal. robertcoogan 12:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Morph (Marvel Comics) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Alexfusco5 19:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC))

Request for mediation not accepted
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Changeling (Marvel Comics), you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Changeling (Marvel Comics) was changed by Robertcoogan (u) (t) deleting 16028 characters on 2008-01-28T03:56:45+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

3RR
Furthermore, you must not revert an article more than 3 times within 24 hours per WP:3RR policy. Doczilla (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


 * You're lucky you didn't already get yourself blocked from Wikipedia for edit warring. You need to take some time and ask people (not me because this is killing my broken arm) about the logic behind past consensus regarding merging or splitting articles. Nobody has supported your version, so you need to take some time to make your case. There's certainly no rush. Don't get yourself blocked for contentious editing. Doczilla (talk) 07:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


 * If you read the discussion page you will see there was no consensus behind the merge. There is no reason, no evidence, behind the merge.  If I get blocked at least I stood up for something.  The discussion page (if you read it) was evenly divided on the merge.  If you are so sure the merge was justified, then what is the reason?!? (robertcoogan) 19:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.233.211.96 (talk)

"No consensus" merge
You are correct that there was a merge without consensus being reached. In the case of Morph/Changling User:Freak104, merged the page after approximatly two months of discussion stating on the Morph page "Moved all the information over. Concensus not needed, Wikipedia policy required merge, concensus to merge into Changeling article." This however is not correct as the this was not a policy but a guideline in this circumstance. I've been aware of this for several months, and if you check the talk page you'll notice that I was a vocal proponent of separate article. If you would chose to rehatch the discussion, you have my full support. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 19:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC).

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 21:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I give up, you win! I guess that the Wikilords win this one.  So much for factual accuracy. You people are unbelievable.  (talk) 06:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC).


 * 1. Have faith in the community. 2. Fave good faith in the other editors, and remind them to have good faith in you. 3.  It's clear you read the previous discussion, use quotes. 4.  Address other users who have similar opinion  on their talk pages to garner support. 5. Please sign with ( - ~ ) rather than typing your name (it will help avoid the bots signing for you). -66.109.248.114 (talk) 22:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC).