User talk:Roberte747

Steve and Connirae Andreas
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Steve and Connirae Andreas, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.steveandreas.com/. As a copyright violation, Steve and Connirae Andreas appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Steve and Connirae Andreas has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Steve and Connirae Andreas. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Steve and Connirae Andreas, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. —Whomp  [ T ] [ C ]  23:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Machine to machine, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 00:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Steve Andreas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Andreas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Steve Andreas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FuriouslySerene (talk) 16:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)