User talk:Robertiki/Archive 1

Your POV reverts on 2012 Italian shooting in the Laccadive Sea
@User talk:Robertiki: I have responded to your repeated edits of the Italian shooting in the Laccadive Sea on both the EDIT and TALK page of the article giving detailed reasons why your POV inclusion is deemed unfit. If you have any suggestions to improve this article or wish to discuss something regarding this article, then please do it on the Talk:2012 Italian shooting in the Laccadive Sea.

In view of your repeated reverts/deletions of contributions on Wikipedia, I have placed a EDIT WARNING on your talk page and will be obliged to escalate the matter if you continue to cause disruption to the article.

81.240.132.34 (talk) 13:31, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Edit war warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 2012 Italian shooting in the Laccadive Sea. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use Talk:2012 Italian shooting in the Laccadive Sea the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 81.240.132.34 (talk) 13:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * About "Edit war" I remark that you are doing it. The single word I inserted, no way could be seen as vandalizing. So before reverting you should have asked in the talk page. Anyway, explanations are given in the article talk page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2012_Italian_shooting_in_the_Laccadive_Sea#User_81.240.132.34 where you could reply.--Robertiki (talk) 13:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * The single word changes the entire meaning of the sentence and is therefore unacceptable as it also is POV. Please make any further comments that you have in the TALK page of the article Talk:2012 Italian shooting in the Laccadive Sea.
 * 81.240.132.34 (talk) 15:29, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

A minor change to DRN
Hi there, you're getting this message as you are involved in a case at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard which is currently open. Today DRN has undergone a big move resulting in individual cases on subpages as opposed to all the content on one page. This is to inform you that your case is now back on the DRN board and you will be able to 'watch' the subpage it's located on. Thanks, Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 13:17, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
B figura (talk) 03:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
B figura (talk) 23:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is How to stop a page being 'gamed' ?. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 06:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


 * @ROBERTIKI: Your participation is solicited in the thread How to stop a page being 'gamed' ? because I have opened a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. My IP has indeed changed but I cannot do much about it. So, as you know I am the Belgian based contributor. 91.182.126.147 (talk) 07:38, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Actual link --Robertiki (talk) 02:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Repeated deletions of sourced content. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Massive re-work of content to suit the Italian narrative on 2012 Italian Navy Marines shooting incident in the Laccadive Sea.The discussion is about the topic 2012 Italian Navy Marines shooting incident in the Laccadive Sea. Thank you. —Onlyfactsnofiction (talk) 00:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shidao Bay Nuclear Power Plant, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rongcheng and Ningjin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BARC and Tarapur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

your reverting of my edit to the name of the Persian Gulf
Hi, Robertiki; I see you have reverted my correction of vandalism to the name of the geographic feature that is the Persian Gulf (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barakah_nuclear_power_plant&oldid=prev&diff=700389315), citing "Plant is on the arabian side, so please respect twin name". I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "twin name". The Persian Gulf only has one name, whether you're on the Iranian side, the Arab side, or if you're in Australia. Just as the Gulf of Mexico only has one name, no matter where you are. To pre-empt an invalid argument I see might be coming up, I invite you to have a look at Persian Gulf naming dispute ... the United Nations and the rest of the world are quite clear that no other name for the Persian Gulf is acceptable or recognized. Based on that ... I will revert the change back. I'm happy to discuss this. Please let me know if there are other grounds, based on which you believe my edit is incorrect. And, please, I mean a reason somewhat more acceptable than "some arabs woke up one morning and decided to call a geographic feature by another dreamed-up name". Regards, Kamran the Great (talk) 19:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Please don't take on me personally. Discussion should not be done on my talk page, but on the article talk page, which I started yesterday and where I explain some points. If you want, repeat there your reasonings, for all the editors. Anyway, re-reverting without trying the proposed discussion is a bit rude. --Robertiki (talk) 19:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Great Russian Encyclopedia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dynamics. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Solana and CSP Edits
Hello Robertiki,

I am having difficulty understanding your edits and have sent you an email. Yukon3472 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yukon3472 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 11 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Discussion should not be done on my talk page, but on the article talk page. If you would like to repeat the content of the mail you sent me, I would be glad to answer. --Robertiki (talk) 00:53, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mettlen–Lavorgo powerline, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hochdorf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 14 March 2016 (UTC)