User talk:Robertmark

Robert Altman (photographer)
Robert Altman (photographer) Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 18:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Altmanphoto
I've noticed that you've been uploading alot of Robert Altman photos, and I've been wondering if they're all authorized or if you've been contacting him through e-mail, because there's a photo of Jim Morrison that I think would help the article very much. Thank you.

--

Robertmark 18:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC) Right, I have uploaded @ 20 photos recently. I am now trying to hold off uploading any more as I'm in a wait and see mode. I am concerned with the generous copyright permissions granted. I am also the photographer.

btw- I've noticed you've removed a Ronnie Spector photo and generously placed my photo atop her page. For myself, with Wikipedia, I am always respectful re whatever photo was already at the top of the page and will never personally remove one that precedes my own addition. I do appreciate the compliment.

Thank you 75pickup. -Robert Altman

Licencing problem
I have re-tagged the images you have uploaded and licenced with cc-by-sa-2.5 changing the licence to copyrighted. The reason is that in the additional text you state that the image may be used in Wikipedia articles. Although you also state conditions for reuse, the express permission given to Wikipedia implicitly negates reuse by others unless these receive a similar explicit permission. This conflicts with our GFDL policy which precludes a "Wikipedia only" clause. According to the current guidelines these images will therefore be deleted. If you decide to allow licencing according to cc-by-sa-2.5 without the invalidating clause, for instance if this is simply a matter of unfortunate enunciation, nothing would please us more! __meco 22:01, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Robert_altman-photo_j–sutton.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Robert_altman-photo_j–sutton.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Iamunknown 02:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

COI
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Robert Altman (photographer), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Şłџğģő 18:33, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Altman rock panel.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Altman rock panel.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 02:54, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Altman rock panel.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Altman rock panel.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:06, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Altman cover sm.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Altman cover sm.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)