User talk:Robertoconnorofficial

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:52, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Robert70.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Robert70.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shinerunner (talk) 00:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Distance-cover.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Distance-cover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sugar-club.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Sugar-club.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Eamonn-Dorans-04.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Eamonn-Dorans-04.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Robert O'Connor
Another editor has added the  template to the article Robert O'Connor, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

How Many Times (Can We Say Goodbye?)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article How Many Times (Can We Say Goodbye?), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of How Many Times (Can We Say Goodbye?). Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Disamb pages
Please do not add non-notable people to disamb pages. These pages are meant to redirect users to existing articles with similar names, not to promote topics whose articles have been deleted. Thank you. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 17:15, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Robertoconnor for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Sum mer PhD (talk) 01:47, 11 November 2011 (UTC)