User talk:Robims

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Santiago. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 12:16, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Santiago
Hello, Robims. I have reverted your edit. Your edit summary claimed that the content you removed was unsourced, but that is incorrect; it contained multiple inline citations. Also, please be aware that approval by the "Santiago city council" carries no weight at Wikipedia and is 100% irrelevant. Please be cautious not to engage in edit warring, and open a discussion in a new section at Talk:Santiago if you'd care to propose that the content be removed from the article. Thanks. Rivertorch (talk) 15:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Robimz
This account appears to be operated by the same person at User:Robimz. Having multiple accounts in against Wikipedia's username policy (Username policy). This account is also in danger of being a single-purpose only account. It seems to exist to sanitize the Santiago article. Single purpose accounts are also an offense at Wikipedia. Jason Quinn (talk) 14:42, 19 June 2011 (UTC)