User talk:Robin Campbell

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Robin Campbell! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Walter van Dyk -

Proposed deletion of Walter van Dyk


The article Walter van Dyk has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * This obvious autobiography or paid-editing PR piece has been tagged as (almost) unreferenced for seven years now, and there comes a point when one has to assume the references won't be forthcoming. A few hits on Google, but I can't see any independent coverage other than the three references already in this article—the rest are all either theatrical listings, imdb and imdb-type "list everyone who appeared" databases for obvious bit-part roles like "Gay Biker Man at Funeral", and mirrors of the Wikipedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &#8209; Iridescent 22:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Walter van Dyk for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Walter van Dyk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Walter van Dyk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  21:44, 11 May 2017 (UTC)