User talk:Robin S. Taylor/Archive-2022

Coat of arms
Why are you adding huge templates explaining the coat of arms to schools and institutions? Is this necessary? Seems pretty out-of-scope. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Minor point


If this shield is described as the original, the spear on the shield should have a silver head, like the one the bird is holding. If you haven't seen it, perhaps you'll enjoy Shakespeare coat of arms. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 22:26, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lord Waddinton 2013.png
Thanks for uploading File:Lord Waddinton 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Euro Car Segment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bentley Mulsanne.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bill Ballantine (Goldman Environmental Prize).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bill Ballantine (Goldman Environmental Prize).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 22:24, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sir Nicholas Wall 2012.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sir Nicholas Wall 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Countess of Ulster


Hello, Robin S. Taylor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Countess of Ulster".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Life peers created by Charles I


A tag has been placed on Category:Life peers created by Charles I indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Life peers created by George I


A tag has been placed on Category:Life peers created by George I indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:31, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Life peers created by James VI and I


A tag has been placed on Category:Life peers created by James VI and I indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Life peers created by James VII and II


A tag has been placed on Category:Life peers created by James VII and II indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Life peers created by George VI


A tag has been placed on Category:Life peers created by George VI indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

"Life barons" category
Hello.

Please don't re-populate Category:Life barons created by George VI. There is no such thing as a life baron. All life peers are created barons; there are no "life viscounts", "life earls", "life marquesses", or "life dukes".

I have re-categorized the articles to Category:Life peers created by George VI.

Thank you.

HandsomeFella (talk) 16:13, 5 April 2022 (UTC)


 * That's not strictly true - as this page and my other categories show. Also the Roll of the Peerage uses the terms "life baron" and "life baroness" as appropriate. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 18:26, 5 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Well, there were. There aren't anymore, see life peer. Just as there are separate categories for peers created by the same monarch but in different jurisdictions – see for instance Category:Peers created by Queen Victoria, which is divided into two subcategories (one for Ireland and one for the United Kingdom), there is no diffusion into the only possible subcategory of Category:Peers created by Edward VII (and subsequent monarchs), namely that for the United Kingdom.
 * I.e., all peers created from Edward VII onwards are created in the Peerage of the United Kingdom. Similarly, it is pointless to have a subcat to Category:Life peers created by George VI that is named Category:Life barons created by George VI, when all life peers are created barons.
 * The roll does use the term life baron, but that is not a reason to introduce a single subcat, and, as I say, there are no "life viscounts", "life earls", "life marquesses", or "life dukes". HandsomeFella (talk) 23:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Countess Mountbatten of Burma Flickr.png
Thanks for uploading File:Countess Mountbatten of Burma Flickr.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — howcheng  {chat} 20:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timothy Duke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David White.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Draft
Howdy. Why do you keep insisting on using 1603, rather then 1707? The British monarchy came into existence in the latter year. That's why we have List of English monarchs & List of Scottish monarchs, ending in 1707 & List of British monarchs, starting in 1707. GoodDay (talk) 19:42, 20 May 2022 (UTC)


 * In terms of the legal institution 1707 is the correct year, but 1603 is more relevant if we're discussing the royal family (as opposed to parliament), since that's when the lines of succession came to merge. Pre-1603 there were two separate royal families and it would be a bit confusing to switch back and forth within the same section, but post-1603 they can be lumped together. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 22:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * You do it 'your' way. GoodDay (talk) 19:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lord King of West Bromwich 2010.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lord King of West Bromwich 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Thomas Greer (senator)
In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template after your citation. I have done so for the above article. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself, and that it's okay to copy verbatim. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 13:24, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Armorial of the speakers of the Irish House of Commons
Hello, Robin S. Taylor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Armorial of the speakers of the Irish House of Commons, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:10, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Armorial of the speakers of the Irish House of Commons


Hello, Robin S. Taylor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Armorial of the speakers of the Irish House of Commons".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:13, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lord James of Rusholme 1962.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lord James of Rusholme 1962.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

UK Supreme Court Badge
I created two versions of the badge for use. File:Badge of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.svg‎ and File:Badge of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom 2.svg. Sorry it took so long. ‎Sodacan (talk) 02:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

The Holy Island of Lindisfarne arms
Do you know if it would be possible to seek permission from the council to display the arms in the article? The link to the charter claims a copyright over the arms. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 19:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:William Rootes 1937.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:William Rootes 1937.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dominic Ingram


The article Dominic Ingram has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG—sources are not independent—and WP:NACADEMIC"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ovinus (talk) 01:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Dominic Ingram for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dominic Ingram is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dominic Ingram until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:51, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lord Pilkington of Oxenford 2010.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lord Pilkington of Oxenford 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

William Henry Hugo Newman-Norton Escutcheon.png
See. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 18:58, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lord Shandon 1918.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lord Shandon 1918.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. &#8209;&#8209;Neveselbert (mobile) (talk · contribs · email) 20:55, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Arms of Sir William Seeds
Hello Robin, Would you like me to send you a jpg of the full coat of arms - I have the original grant of coat of arms which includes the crest and all details which you describe but are not shown on your photo? I was toying with the tackling the task of uploading the coat of arms when I noticed you had uploaded this section (thank you!) I am the last person who has the right to bear the arms (whatever that means..) when I die the arms will become derelict apparently.... Corinna seeds (talk) 22:32, 29 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the offer, but I can already see the full achievement illustrated in the manuscript to which I linked. Feel free to upload a scan of the letters patent (as I would assume the copyright has expired by now) if you prefer. I chose to depict only the shield as I felt that the hand holding wheat was a little beyond my digital drawing skills. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 15:26, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reply - only just seen. The hand holding wheat has already been expertly drawn by the engravers (Kindersley) and I have their original drawing. Might upload at some point but doubt it. My daughter has just had it tattooed on her wrist - my grandfather would roll over in his grave... Corinna seeds (talk) 12:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC)