User talk:Robinator336

Hi,

Just so you know, it is considered extremely rude by some editors to revert, as you did here without using an edit summary. It could be perceived as in violation of the WP:AGF behavioral guideline, since reversions without an edit summary are generally reserved for reverting simple vandalism, which the edit in question clearly was not. Thank you for your future cooperation in this matter, Silly rabbit (talk) 03:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Chetblong TalkSign 04:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

You revert to David Gest was to a version which lacked citation and included WP:PEACOCK problems. After a thread on WP:AN/I a few days back, I edited it down to acceptable levels. You tried to reinstate the uncited mess it had been. In the future, please review an article's history before reverting another editor's reversion, especially a reversion in which the other editor had given clear reasons for the reversion, thank you. ThuranX (talk) 04:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)